Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807

Browse

Filters

2019 - 20202

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.rights: search.filters.rights.info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessSubject: search.filters.subject.Lymphoma

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    A Comparison of the BEAM and MITO/MEL Conditioning Regimens for Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Hodgkin Lymphoma: An Analysis of Efficiency and Treatment-Related Toxicity
    (2020) Yeral, Mahmut; Aytan, Pelin; Gungor, Burcu; Boga, Can; Unal, Ali; Koc, Yener; Kaynar, Leylagul; Buyukkurt, Nurhilal; Eser, Bulent; Ozdogu, Hakan; 0000-0002-8902-1283; 0000-0002-0895-4787; 0000-0002-9680-1958; 0000-0002-9580-628X; 32605899; AAD-5542-2021; AAE-1457-2021; AAD-6222-2021
    In this multicenter retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and MITO/MEL (mitoxantrone, melphalan) preparation regimens. The 3-year expected overall survival for the MIT/MEL and BEAM were 86.1% and 91.3%, respectively. The MITO/MEL seems to be as effective as the BEAM but has better tolerability in terms of pulmonary toxicity and may be used as an alternative option. Background: Approximately half of patients with relapsed chemosensitive disease achieve robust responses with BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and autologous stem cell rescue. The scarcity of comparative studies further limits alternative treatment protocols, such as the MITO/MEL (mitoxantrone, melphalan) protocol. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective multicenter study, we compared the BEAM and MITO/MEL regimens used before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in terms of efficacy and side effects in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma. Data met international accreditation rules. Before ASCT, 108 patients received the MITO/MEL, and 34 patients received the BEAM. Results: The median follow-up time was 36 months in the MITO/MEL group (range, 3-178) and 23 months in the BEAM group (range, 4-99). After ASCT, the 3-year expected overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 86.1% and 86.1% for the MITO/MEL group and 91.3% and 76.5% for the BEAM group, respectively. Although 50% of patients developed febrile neutropenia attacks in the MITO/MEL group, this rate was 91.1% in the BEAM group. The grade II and higher rates of hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, and cardiac toxicities were similar in both groups. However, the rate of pulmonary toxicity was determined to be 1.9% in the MITO/MEL group and 29.4% in the BEAM group (P < .001). Conclusion: The MITO/MEL conditioning regimen seems to be as effective as the BEAM regimen but has better tolerability in terms of pulmonary toxicity and may be used as an alternative option if necessary, depending on the comorbidity status of the patient.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Primary extranodal lymphoma of the glands. Literature review and options for best practice in 2019
    (2019) Belkacemi, Yazid; Sio, Torence T.; Colson-Durand, Laurianne; Onal, Cem; Villa, Salvador; Anacak, Yavuz; Krengli, Marco; Thariat, Juliette; Ugurluer, Gamze; Miller, Robert C.; Mirimanoft, Rene-Olivier; Ozsahin, Mahmut; To, Nhu Hanh; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 30819450; D-5195-2014
    Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (EN-NHL) are a heterogeneous group of malignancies that involve numerous entities with significant difference in terms of tumor site locations, prognostic factors, biology expression, and therapeutic options. In the literature, many EN-NHL types were reported from limited series which only allowed narrow views for elucidating prognostic factors and defining the role of loco-regional therapies in the era of new systemic and biologically targeted therapies. The Rare Cancer Network (RCN), an international multidisciplinary consortium, has published a number of reports on several EN-NHL sites which included many gland locations. In this review, we will focus on the recent literature for a selected number of EN-NHL types in both exocrine and endocrine gland locations. We aim to provide renewed and clear messages for the best practice in 2019 for diagnosis, histopathology, treatments, and also their prognostic implications. We believe that better understanding of molecular and genetic characteristics of these particular diseases is crucial for an appropriate management in the era of personalized treatment developments.