Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807

Browse

Filters

2016 - 20202

Settings

search.filters.applied.f.publicationcategory: search.filters.publicationcategory.Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli DergiSubject: search.filters.subject.Acute appendicitis

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Does Scoring System Help Us in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis? A Prospective Clinical Trial
    (2020) Guler, Yilmaz; Dogan, Pasa; Sengul, Serkan; Calis, Hasan; Karabulut, Zulfikar; 0000-0002-0612-8545; AAJ-9030-2021
    It is very important to make accurate and early diagnosis to reduce both the rate of negative laparotomy and the morbidity and mortality associated with acute appendicitis. Numerous scoring systems have been described in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. We aimed to determine the accuracy rates of these scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis by applying Alvarado, Eskelinen, and Ohmann clinical scoring systems to patients who underwent appendectomy. This study was performed on patients who underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis at Baskent University Alanya Hospital and Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University Education and Research Hospital between September 2017 and December 2018. The sensitivity and specificity of Alvarado, Eskelinen, and Ohmann scoring systems as well as the compatibility analysis of scoring systems with pathology results were investigated. A total of 554 patients undergoing appendectomy were included in the study. The sensitivity of Eskelinen scoring method was found to be 53.4%, the specificity was 68.1%; the sensitivity of Alvarado scoring method 41.6%, the specificity 79.7%; and the sensitivity of Ohmann scoring system 94.0%, the specificity was 8.7%. In conclusion, Ohmann scoring system has the highest sensitivity; it could be more efficient in exclusion of the appendicitis diagnosis due to its low specificity. It is also concluded that some clinical parameters that are scored in Eskelinen and Alvarado scoring systems may decrease the sensitivity and specificity of these methods depending on the patient population and atypical clinical presentations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Acute appendicitis during pregnancy: case series of 20 pregnant women
    (2016) Arer, Ilker Murat; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Yesilagac, Hasan; Yabanoglu, Hakan; 0000-0002-1161-3369; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0002-1365-9256; 28074461; AAJ-7865-2021; AAY-2668-2021; AAI-8400-2021; AAJ-6068-2021
    BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common cause of acute abdomen during pregnancy. Most of the signs of appendicitis are also found during normal pregnancy period, however, and diagnosis of appendicitis during pregnancy remains challenging. The aim of the current study was to report our clinical experience of AA during pregnancy and investigate optimal management of this difficult situation. METHODS: Records of 20 pregnant women with diagnosis of AA who underwent appendectomy between 2005 and 2015 were included in this study. Data were collected retrospectively. Patients were evaluated according to age, signs and symptoms, gestational age, physical findings, serum white blood cell count, ultrasound (US) findings, pathology reports, surgical technique, operation time, and complications. RESULTS: Of 20 patients, 16 (80%) underwent open appendectomy and 4 (20%) underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Mean age of patients was 29.6 +/- 5.6 years. Most common symptom was abdominal pain (95%). Six (30%) patients were in first trimester, 9 (45%) patients were in second trimester and 5 (25%) patients in were in third trimester. US findings consistent with AA were found in 12 (60%) patients. Negative appendectomy rate was 30%. Maternal complication was seen in only 1 (5%) patient. No fetal complication was observed. CONCLUSION: Accurate diagnosis and prompt surgical treatment of AA in pregnant women should be performed due to high rates of maternal and fetal complications.