Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Tacrolimus intrapatient variability in BK virus nephropathy and chronic calcineurin toxicity in kidney transplantation(2021) Turgut, Didem; Sayin, Burak; Soy, Ebru Ayvazoglu; Topcu, Deniz İlhan; Ozdemir, Binnaz Handan; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 0000-0002-0993-9917; 35017328; AAJ-8097-2021; AAC-5566-2019Intrapatient variability (IPV) in tacrolimus has been increasingly acknowledged as a risk factor for poor graft survival after kidney transplantation. Although past studies have mainly accounted for IPV in acute or chronic rejection states as due to underimmunosuppression, this is not yet clear. So far, tacrolimus IPV for BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKVN) and chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity (CNIT) has not been investigated. Here, we evaluated IPV in tacrolimus for BKVN and chronic CNIT, which are mainly considered as overimmunosuppression states. In this caseucontrol study, kidney allograft biopsies conducted between 1998 and 2018 were included, with patients grouped by biopsy results as BKVN alone group, CNIT alone group, and normal graft function (control group). IPV was estimated as mean absolute deviation. Our study groups included 25 kidney transplant recipients with BKVN alone, 91 patients with CNIT alone, and 60 patients with normal 5-year graft survival (control group). In analyses of IPV in tacrolimus six months before graft biopsy, IPV was highest in the BKVN group (P = 0.001). The BKVN group also had the highest IPV in tacrolimus at 12 months after biopsy (P = 0.001), with all pairwise comparisons statistically different between groups. At 12 months after biopsy, five patients (20%) in the BKVN group and 10 patients (10.9%) in the CNIT group had graft loss. Among other risk factors, BKVN and chronic CNIT are consequences related to high IPV. Quantification of IVP for tacrolimus in clinical practice would help to optimize kidney transplant outcomes.Item Recommended Treatment for Antibody-mediated Rejection After Kidney Transplantation: The 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group(2020) Ozdemir, Binnaz H.; 0000-0002-7528-3557; 31895348; X-8540-2019With the development of modern solid-phase assays to detect anti-HLA antibodies and a more precise histological classification, the diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) has become more common and is a major cause of kidney graft loss. Currently, there are no approved therapies and treatment guidelines are based on low-level evidence. The number of prospective randomized trials for the treatment of AMR is small, and the lack of an accepted common standard for care has been an impediment to the development of new therapies. To help alleviate this, The Transplantation Society convened a meeting of international experts to develop a consensus as to what is appropriate treatment for active and chronic active AMR. The aim was to reach a consensus for standard of care treatment against which new therapies could be evaluated. At the meeting, the underlying biology of AMR, the criteria for diagnosis, the clinical phenotypes, and outcomes were discussed. The evidence for different treatments was reviewed, and a consensus for what is acceptable standard of care for the treatment of active and chronic active AMR was presented. While it was agreed that the aims of treatment are to preserve renal function, reduce histological injury, and reduce the titer of donor-specific antibody, there was no conclusive evidence to support any specific therapy. As a result, the treatment recommendations are largely based on expert opinion. It is acknowledged that properly conducted and powered clinical trials of biologically plausible agents are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.Item Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein to Albumin Ratio in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients Treated with Concurrent Radiotherapy and Temozolomide(2020) Topkan, Erkan; Besen, Ali A.; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Kucuk, Ahmet; Pehlivan, Berrin; Selek, Ugur; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 32566124; AAD-6910-2021; M-9530-2014; AAG-2213-2021Objective. We investigated the prognostic impact of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CRP/Alb) on the survival outcomes of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent plus adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ).Methods. The pretreatment CRP and Alb records of GBM patients who underwent RT and concurrent plus adjuvant TMZ were retrospectively analyzed. The CRP/Alb was calculated by dividing serum CRP level by serum Alb level obtained prior to RT. The availability of significant cutoff value for CRP/Alb that interacts with survival was assessed with the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary endpoint was the association between the CRP/Alb and the overall survival (OS).Results. A total of 153 patients were analyzed. At a median follow-up of 14.7 months, median and 5-year OS rates were 16.2 months (95% CI: 12.5-19.7) and 9.5%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The ROC curve analysis identified a significant cutoff value at 0.75 point (area under the curve: 74.9%; sensitivity: 70.9%; specificity: 67.7%;P<0.001) for CRP/Alb that interacts with OS and grouped the patients into two: CRP/Alb <0.75 (n = 61) and >= 0.75 (n = 92), respectively. Survival comparisons revealed that the CRP/Alb <0.75 was associated with a significantly superior median (22.5 versus 15.7 months;P<0.001) and 5-year (20% versus 0%) rates than the CRP/Alb >= 0.75, which retained its independent significance in multivariate analysis (P<0.001).Conclusion. Present results suggested the pretreatment CRP/Alb as a significant and independent inflammation-based index which can be utilized for further prognostic lamination of GBM patients.Item The acromegaly registry of ten different centers in Turkey(2020) Keskin, Caglar; Demir, Ozgur; Karci, Alper Cagri; Berker, Dilek; Canturk, Zeynep; Yaylali, Guzin Fidan; Topsakal, Senay; Ersoy, Reyhan; Bayram, Fahri; Ertorer, Melek Eda; Bozkirli, Emre; Haydardedeoglu, Filiz; Dilekci, Esra Nur Ademoglu; Ay, Seyid Ahmet; Cansu, Guven Baris; Sahin, Mustafa; Emral, Rifat; Corapcioglu, Demet; 0000-0002-0179-9673; 0000-0001-7357-8709; 32417639; AAK-5003-2021; ABI-3705-2020; ABI-3393-2020Objectives: To describe biochemical and clinical features, and therapeutic outcomes of acromegaly patients in Turkey. Methods: Retrospective multicenter epidemiological study of 547 patients followed in 10 centers of the Turkish Acromegaly registry. Results: A total of 547 acromegaly patients (55% female) with a median age of 41 was included in this study. Majority of patients had a macroadenoma (78%). Transsphenoidal surgery was performed as primary treatment in 92% of the patients (n = 503). Surgical remission rate was 39% (197/503) in all operated patients. Overall disease control was achieved in 70% of patients. Remission group were significantly older than non-remission group (p = .002). Patients with microadenomas had significantly higher remission rates than patients with macroadenomas (p < .001). Patients with microadenomas were significantly older at the time of diagnosis when compared to patients with macroadenomas (p < .001). Preoperative growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels were significantly lower in the remission group (p < .001). Initial IGF-1 and GH levels were significantly higher in macroadenomas compared to microadenomas (p < .001). Medical treatment was administered as a second-line treatment (97%) in almost all patients without remission. Radiotherapy was preferred in 21% of the patients mostly as a third line treatment. Conclusions: This is one of the largest real life studies evaluating the epidemiological characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with acromegaly who were followed in different centers in Turkey. Transsphenoidal surgery in the treatment of acromegaly still remains the most valid method. Medical treatment options may improve long-term disease outcomes in patients who cannot be controlled with surgical treatment (up to 70%).Item Secondary Vascular Access Procedures for Hemodialysis After Primary Snuff-Box Arteriovenous Fistula(2017) Kirnap, Mahir; Tezcaner, Tugan; Moray, Gokhan; 0000-0002-3641-8674; 0000-0003-2498-7287; AAD-9865-2021; AAE-1041-2021; AAH-9198-2019Aim: To investigate the secondary arteriovenous fistulas constructed after a snuff-box fistula. Material and Method: We reviewed data on 95 arteriovenous fistulas that were created as a secondary vascular access between January 2007 and December 2015. Of those 95 fistulas, 37 (39%) were ipsilateral elbow brachial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas and 58 (61%) were ipsilateral wrist radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas; all were created after a primary snuff-box fistula. Results: All arteriovenous fistulas had matured. The primary patency rates for elbow brachial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas and radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistulas were as follows: 1-year rate, 88% to 87% and 4-year rate, 70% to 61%. The secondary patency rates for were as follows: 1-year rate, 91% to 93%; 4-year rate, 72% to 63%. No early failure occurred. There were 15 late failures. The most common causes of failure were stenosis within the vein (n=8 patients), aneurysm (n=5 patients), and central vein stenosis (n=2 patients). Discussion: These data suggest that before a radial-cephalic or brachial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula is created, the construction of a snuff-box fistula enable the vascular structures to dilate, and may so fascilitate the success rate of seconder AVFs. For this reason a radial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula or an elbow brachial-cephalic arteriovenous fistula should be the second choice.