Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807

Browse

Filters

20222

Settings

Author: search.filters.author.Tuncer, Nilufer Iremsearch.filters.applied.f.rights: search.filters.rights.info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Clinical Effectiveness Of Buccally And Palatally Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization: The Miniscrew-Supported 3-Dimensional Maxillary Bimetric Distalizing Arch Vs The Beneslider
    (2022) Tuncer, Nilufer Irem; Arman-Ozcirpici, Ayca; 36457217
    Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the dentoalveolar and skeletal changes achieved with a novel miniscrew-supported 3-dimensional maxillary bimetric distalizing arch (3D-MBDA) and the Beneslider. In addition, the study aimed to compare these changes between each other and with an untreated control group. Methods: Sixty-five patients with bilateral Class II molar relationship and fully-erupted maxillary second molars were included in the study. Of these patients, 23 received the miniscrew-supported 3D-MBDA (group 1), 21 received the Beneslider (group 2), and 21 served as untreated control subjects (group 3). Lateral cephalometric films and dental casts, taken at the beginning and the end of maxillary molar distalization, were analyzed to study the differences between the groups. Results: The crown distalization of the first molars was similar between the treatment groups (group 1, 3.1 mm; group 2, 3.3 mm); however, root distalization was significantly more in group 1 (5 mm) when compared with group 2 (1.7 mm). The first molars tipped 6.2 degrees in the mesial direction in group 1 and 8.2 degrees in the distal direction in group 2. The mesiobuccal cusp tip of the first molars extruded for 1.2 mm and increased vertical dimensions in group 2, whereas it intruded for 1.7 mm in group 1. Meanwhile, aforementioned parameters presented insignificant changes throughout the observation period in the control group. Inter-first molar width increased significantly in group 2 (2.7 mm). Distalization time was similar between the groups (group 1, 14 months; group 2, 15 months). The distalization rate was higher in group 2 (0.27 mm/mo) than in group 1 (0.23 mm/mo) measured from the crowns; however, it was similar between the groups (group 1, 0.25 mm/mo; group 2, 0.19 mm/mo) when measured from the trifurcation point. Conclusions: The miniscrew-supported 3D-MBDA was more effective in distalizing molar roots and maintaining vertical parameters and dental arch width while tipping the molars mesially. In contrast, the Beneslider distalized molar crowns faster, resulting in significant distal tipping. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022;162:e337-e348)
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Cephalometric Mandibular Dimensions in Growing Turkish Children: Trends of Change, Sex-Specific Differences, and Comparisons with Published Norms
    (2022) Pamukcu, Hande; Tuncer, Nilufer Irem; Pelin, Ismail Can; Zengin, Hatice Yagmur; 36155404
    Objective: The aims of this study were to investigate cephalometric mandibular dimensions in growing Anatolian Turkish children and to identify the periods of rapid growth for boys and girls. Furthermore, the secondary aim was to compare obtained values with published standards in the literature. Methods: A total of 528 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs, grouped according to age and sex, were analyzed. Effective mandibular length, ramus height, and corpus lengths were comparatively evaluated within age groups for boys and girls and between sexes for the same age group. Data acquired from this study were compared with American, Canadian, Chinese, and European norms. Growth curves for mandible were constructed for each sex group. Results: Effective mandibular length was almost always significantly longer in boys, except for 9- and 12-year-age groups. Effective mandibular length in girls increased significantly between ages 8 and 10, 10 and 12, and 11 and 13 years, while in boys between ages 8 and 10, 9 and 11, and 13 and 15 years. Turkish girls had significantly shorter effective mandibular lengths than American girls at age 14. No significant difference was found between Turkish and Chinese girls and boys. Turkish girls and boys had significantly shorter corpus lengths from their Norwegian counterparts at age 12. Conclusion: Except for 9- and 12-year-age groups, effective mandibular length was almost always significantly longer in boys compared to the girls. It is suggested to use norm values from more recently conducted studies and which are representative of the studied population. Growth curves can be used to predict the approximate mandibular dimensions at a particular age.