Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: A randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study(2020) Alisar, Dilek Cetinkaya; Ozen, Selin; Sozay, Seyhan; 0000-0002-8460-7699; 0000-0002-7290-8558; 0000-0002-9610-2153; 31699572; AAJ-2936-2021; ABC-1305-2020Background and Purpose: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a treatment used in the rehabilitation of stroke patients aiming to improve functionality of the plegic upper extremity. Currently, tDCS is not routinely used in post stroke rehabilitation. The aim of this study was to establish the effects of bihemspheric tDCS combined with physical therapy (PT) and occupational therapy (OT) on upper extremity motor function. Methods: Thirty-two stroke inpatients were randomised into 2 groups. All patients received 15 sessions of conventional upper extremity PT and OT over 3 weeks. The tDCS group (n = 16) also received 30 minutes of bihemispheric tDCS and the sham group (n = 16) 30 minutes of sham bihemispheric tDCS simultaneously to OT. Patients were evaluated before and after treatment using the Fug1 Meyer upper extremity (FMUE), functional independence measure (FIM), and Brunnstrom stages of stroke recovery (BSSR) by a physiatrist blind to the treatment group Results: The improvement in FIM was higher in the tDCS group compared to the sham group (P = .001). There was a significant within group improvement in FMUE, FIM and BSSR in those receiving tDCS (P = .001). There was a significant improvement in FIM in the chronic (> 6months) stroke sufferers who received tDCS when compared to those who received sham tDCS and when compared to subacute stroke (3-6 months) sufferers who received tDCS/sham. Conclusions: Upper extremity motor function in hemiplegic stroke patients improves when bihemispheric tDCS is used alongside conventional PT and OT. The improvement in functionality is greater in chronic stroke patients.Item Does the presence of ideomotor apraxia in stroke patients adversely affect rehabilitation outcomes? A prospective study(2020) Cosar, Sacide Nur Saracgil; Ozen, Selin; Selcuk, Selin Taflan; Yemisci, Oya Umit; 0000-0001-8306-463X; AAF-1085-2021Background and Objectives: Ideomotor apraxia is an inability to perform a gesture following a verbal command despite having intact knowledge of the task. The presence of ideomotor apraxia may negatively affect functional outcome of stroke patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ideomotor apraxia on rehabilitation outcomes following first ever stroke. Methods: A cross sectional observational study of 35 stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation unit for treatment. Patients were evaluated for ideomotor apraxia using the ideomotor apraxia test. Function was assessed before and after treatment using the Functional Independence Measure, motricity index and functional ambulation scale. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Functional Independence Measure and mini mental state examination. Results: Ideomotor apraxia was present in 31.4% of patients. Mean Functional Independence Measure motor and cognitive scores of apraxic patients on admission and at discharge were lower than those of non-apraxic patients, (p<0.05). The cognitive and total Functional Independence Measure scores and motricity scores in the ideomotor apraxia group on discharge had not reached the admission values of the non-ideomotor apraxia group. Conclusion: The presence of ideomotor apraxia following stroke has a negative impact on overall function, both before and after rehabilitation, when compared to stroke patients without ideomotor apraxia. Stroke patients must be assessed for ideomotor apraxia prior to commencement of a rehabilitation program in order to guide treatment and determine realistic treatment goals.