Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 11
  • Item
    Reference values of the ductus venosus pulsatility index for pregnant women between 11 and 13(+6) weeks of gestation
    (2020) Kalayci, Hakan; Baran, Safak Yilmaz; Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Yetkinel, Selcuk; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Ozdogan, Serdinc; Simsek, Seda Yuksel; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0002-5064-5267; 0000-0002-2165-9168; 0000-0001-5874-7324; 0000-0002-1767-1527; 30157671; AAK-8872-2021; AAK-7016-2021; AAI-8400-2021; ABF-6439-2020; AAI-9594-2021; AAL-1530-2021
    Purpose: The ductus venosus pulsatility index velocity (DV PIV) has become a popular ultrasonographic measurement during the first trimester of pregnancy. The value of the DV PIV has been the topic of ongoing discussion in the literature, and its reference value in the normal population has not yet been established. Therefore, we aimed to determine a reference value for the DV PIV. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated our records of first-trimester ultrasonography performed between 2016 and 2017. Our inclusion criteria were as follows: singleton pregnancy; crown-rump length (CRL) between 45 and 84 mm; absence of structural abnormalities on the ultrasound examination; and absence of chromosomal abnormalities. Records of 820 patients were evaluated. According to the inclusion criteria, records of 458 patients were included in this study. All ultrasound examinations were performed by a single operator with the Voluson E8 (5- to 8-MHz 3 D transducer; General Electric Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) via the transabdominal route. Gestational weeks were designated according to CRL measurements at the beginning of the examination. Nuchal translucency (NT), nasal bone visualization (NB), tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR), "a"-wave pattern, DV PIV, S-wave (peak systolic velocity), D-wave (peak diastolic velocity), a-wave (atrial contraction in late diastole), and time-averaged maximum velocity (TAMXV) measurements were performed. To evaluate the DV Doppler images, a mid-sagittal view of the fetal profile was obtained. Color Doppler and pulse Doppler gate were used in the distal portion of the umbilical sinus, and at least three typical DV waveforms were detected. The SPSS 21.0 statistical program (IBM, Armonk, NY) was used to analyze variables. Results: The mean age, body mass index, CRL, gestational age, and NT values were 30.3 years (range, 18-45), 23.9 kg/m(2) (range, 15.5-46.6), 59.5 mm (range, 45-79), 12.3 weeks (range, 11.2-13.6), and 1.58 mm (range, 0.73-2.62), respectively. The median gravidity and parity were 2 (1-8) and 0 (0-4), respectively. The "a"-wave pattern was identified in all cases, but TR was not detected in any of the cases. Measurements of DV PIV with a Gaussian distribution were suitable according to the Shapiro-Wilk test (p = .252). The mean DV PIV was 0.98, and the fifth and 95th percentiles were 0.73 and 1.22 (+/- 2 SD), respectively. A statistical analysis of our cohort revealed that DV PIV values less than 0.73 and more than 1.22 were beyond the normal range. The mean S-wave, D-wave, a-wave, and TAMXV values were 31.18, 25.64, 8.68, and 22.72 cm/s, respectively. Conclusions: The value of DV PIV measurements is debated in the literature. Using our cohort, we defined the means and ranges of DV PIV. Determining the normal ranges of DV PIV could be helpful to anticipate congenital or chromosomal abnormalities. Further studies are needed to demonstrate the clinical importance of DV PIV, especially for patients with abnormal DV PIV measurements.
  • Item
    Pregnancy of patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: maternal and neonatal outcomes
    (2020) Kalayci, Hakan; Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Baran, Safak Yilmaz; Simsek, Seda Yuksel; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Ozdogan, Serdinc; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 0000-0002-5064-5267; 0000-0001-5874-7324; 0000-0002-1767-1527; 31397144; AAK-7016-2021; AAI-8400-2021; ABF-6439-2020; AAK-8872-2021; AAI-9594-2021
    Objective: Thrombocytopenia occurs in 7% of pregnant women. Along with other causes, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), which is an autoimmune disease with autoantibodies causing platelet destruction, must be considered in the differential diagnosis. Antiplatelet antibodies can cross the placenta and cause thrombocytopenia in the newborn. The aim of our study was to assess the management of ITP in pregnancy, and to investigate neonatal outcomes. Material and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary center including 89 pregnant patients with ITP followed between October 2011 and January 2018. Patients were evaluated in two groups according to diagnoses of ITP and chronic ITP. Age, obstetric history, ITP diagnosis, and follow-up period, presence of splenectomy, platelet count during pregnancy and after birth, treatment during pregnancy, route of delivery, weight and platelet count of newborn, sign of hemorrhage, and fetal congenital anomaly were assessed. Results: Considering the ITP and chronic ITP groups, no significant difference was seen with respect to parity, timing of delivery, preoperative and postoperative platelet counts, and hemoglobin values. Route of delivery, birth weight, APGAR scores, newborn platelet count, and congenital anomaly rates were also similar. The timing of treatment was different because patients whose diagnoses were established during pregnancy were mostly treated for preparation of delivery. Treatment modalities were similar. Conclusion: Probability of severe thrombocytopenia at delivery is higher in patients with ITP who are diagnosed during pregnancy when compared with patients who received prepregnancy diagnoses. ITP is an important disease for both the mother and newborn. Patients should be followed closely in cooperation with the hematology department.
  • Item
    Role of prophylactic and therapeutic red blood cell exchange in pregnancy with sickle cell disease: Maternal and perinatal outcomes
    (2020) Baran, Safak Yilmaz; Kozanoglu, Ilknur; Korur, Asli; Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Kalayaci, Hakan; Alemdaroglu, Songul; Asma, Suheyl; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; Boga, Can; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 0000-0002-5086-5593; 0000-0002-5268-1210; 0000-0003-4335-6659; 0000-0001-5335-7976; 0000-0002-5064-5267; 0000-0002-8902-1283; 0000-0001-5874-7324; 0000-0002-9680-1958; 32797735; ABF-6439-2020; AAK-8872-2021; AAD-5616-2021; AAD-6222-2021; AAE-1241-2021; AAI-8400-2021; AAI-7831-2021; AAI-9594-2021; AAD-5542-2021
    Background and Aim The incidence of fetomaternal complications during pregnancy is high for women with sickle cell disease (SCD), which is the most common hematologic genetic disorder worldwide. Prophylactic red blood cell exchange (pRBCX) has been shown to be efficient, safe, and feasible for preventing complications. The aim of this study was to observe maternal, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies in which pRBCX was. Method This was a single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study, which recruited 46 consecutive adult pregnant women with SCD between January 2012 and June 2019. Obstetric features, SCD-related complications, and fetomaternal outcomes were compared between the 27 patients who received prophylactic exchange and the 19 who did not (therapeutic exchange was performed in 7 and was not performed in 12 cases). Results Painful crises, preeclampsia, and preterm birth rates were significantly higher in the group that did not receive prophylactic exchange (control group;P= .001,P= .024, andP= .027, respectively). There was one maternal mortality in the control group (P= .41). Incidence of adverse fetal or maternal complications was significantly higher in the control group (P= .044 andP= .007, respectively). Conclusions Our center's experience over a 7.5-year period, as described above, demonstrates that pRBCX in SCD affects the course of pregnancy positively by ameliorating negative fetomaternal outcomes.
  • Item
    Does abnormal ductus venosus pulsatility index at the first-trimester effect on adverse pregnancy outcomes?
    (2020) Baran, Safak Yilmaz; Kalayci, Hakan; Durdag, Gulsen Dogan; Yetkinel, Selcuk; Arslan, Alev; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 0000-0002-2165-9168; 0000-0002-5064-5267; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 0000-0003-4444-0027; 0000-0001-5874-7324; 32623067; AAL-1530-2021; AAI-9594-2021; AAK-8872-2021; V-1112-2019
    Aim: The ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV PIV) has become a popular marker of the first-trimester scan. The aim of this study is to search for any difference between groups with normal and abnormal DV PIV values in terms of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 556 women whose first-trimester scan was performed. The ductus venosus pulsatility indices were examined at singleton pregnancies between 11 and 14 weeks of gestation. Patients were categorized as Group-I with normal DV PIV (DV PIV >= 0.73, <= 1.22) and as Group-II with abnormal DV PIV. Group-II was subgrouped as Group-IIA which composed of patients with DV PIV < 0.73 and as Group-IIB with DV PIV > 1.22. Results: There were 451 subjects in Group-I and 105 subjects in Group-II (Group-IIA = 32 and Group-IIB 73). The comparisons between major groups revealed a statistically significant increase about miscarriage (p = 0.002), stillbirth (p < 0.001), small for gestational age (p = 0.033), low birth weight (p < 0.001), fetal growth restriction (p = 0.048), and major congenital heart defect (p=<0.001) in Group-II. This difference is mainly due to Group-IIB. There is no difference in preterm delivery, preeclampsia and gestational diabetes between Group I and II. Conclusion: Routinely monitoring DIV PIV as a first-trimester screening should provide valuable information regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes such as miscarriage, stillbirth, small for gestational age, low birth weight, fetal growth restriction and major congenital heart defect. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The effect of preserving prepared sperm samples at room temperature or at 37 C-circle before intrauterine insemination (IUI) on clinical pregnancy rate
    (2015) Cok, Tayfun; Aytac, Pinar Caglar; Simsek, Erhan; Haydardedeoglu, Bulent; Kalayci, Hakan; Ozdemir, Halis; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 28913033
    Objective: The comparison of the effect of preserving prepared sperm samples at room temperature or at 37(circle)C before intrauterine insemination (IUI) on clinical pregnancy rate. Materials and Methods: Retrospective clinical research. University hospital, infertility clinic. Patients with one or two follicles, between the ages of 20 and 40, whose infertility period was less than 6 years and the injected total motile sperm count was more than 10 million. Preserving sperm samples prepared for IUI at 37(circle)C or at room temperature before IUI. The clinical pregnancy rate of IUI cycles between 1st of January 2004 and 1st of December 2011 in which prepared sperm samples were preserved at 37(circle)C and the clinical pregnancy rate of IUI cycles between 1st of December 2011 and 31st of May 2014 in which prepared sperm samples preserved at room temperature. Results: Clinical pregnancy rates were similar in IUI cycles in which prepared sperm samples were preserved at 37(circle)C and at room temperature (9.3% vs. 8.9%). Clinical pregnancy rates in IUI cycles with 2 follicles were higher than IUI cycles with 1 follicle (10.8% vs. 7.6%) (p=0.002). Further statistical analysis after splitting data according to the number of the follicles revealed that there was no statistical difference between clinical pregnancy rates after IUI cycles in which prepared sperm samples were preserved at 37(circle)C or at room temperature in both one follicle (7.6% vs. 7.6%), and two follicle cycles (11.5% vs. 10.1%). Conclusions: Preserving prepared sperm samples at room temperature had no negative effect on clinical pregnancy rates when compared with reserving prepared sperm samples at 37(circle)C during IUI cycles.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The combination of dehydroepiandrosterone, transdermal testosterone, and growth hormone as an adjuvant therapy in assisted reproductive technology cycles in patients aged below 40 years with diminished ovarian reserve
    (2015) Haydardedeoglu, Bulent; Isik, Ahmet Zeki; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 28913044
    Objective: To evaluate to the efficacy of testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and growth hormone (GH) supplementations in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort including 33 women with 81 ART cycles were aged and ovarian reserve matched 52 women with 102 conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) protocol. Administration of DHEA for 12 weeks and transdermal testosterone for 4 weeks as pretreatment adjuvant and luteal start GH in DOR patient treatment arm compared to conventional IVF/ICSI cycles. Results: The number of follicles > 14 mm, number of oocytes, number of metaphase 2 oocytes and fertilisation rate were significantly higher in ISIK protocol (IP). The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per embryo transfer of the IP was 38.2% (13/34). The cancellation rate of cycles decreased significantly from 54.5 % (24/44) to 8.1% (3/37) with the IP, while the OPR was 35.3% (12/34). Conclusions: Our study has shown that even the poorest responders could achieve clinical pregnancy after inducing ovarian folliculogenesis with a combination of transdermal testosterone, DHEA.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Addition of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist for luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization: an analysis of 2739 cycles
    (2015) Simsek, Erhan; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; Aytac, Pinar Caglar; Coban, Gonca; Simsek, Seda Yüksel; Cok, Tayfun; Haydardedeoglu, Bulent; 26097392
    Objective: Luteal phase is defective in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, and many regimens were tried for the very best luteal phase support (LPS). Gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist use, which was administered as an adjunct to the luteal phase support in IVF cycles, was suggested to improve pregnancy outcome measures in certain randomized studies. We analyzed the effects of addition of GnRH agonist to standard progesterone luteal support on pregnancy outcome measures, particularly the live birth rates. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, including 2739 IVF cycles. Long GnRH agonist and antagonist stimulation IVF cycles with cleavage-stage embryo transfer were included. Cycles were divided into two groups: Group A included cycles with single-dose GnRH agonist plus progesterone LPS and Group B included progesterone only LPS. Live birth rates were the primary outcome measures of the analysis. Miscarriage rates and multiple pregnancy rates were the secondary outcome measures. Results: Live birth rates were not statistically different in GnRH agonist plus progesterone (Group A) and progesterone only (Group B) groups in both the long agonist and antagonist stimulation arms (40.8%/41.2% and 32.8%/34.4%, p<0.05 respectively). Moreover, pregnancy rates, implantation rates, and miscarriage rates were found to be similar between groups. Multiple pregnancy rates in antagonist cycles were significantly higher in Group A than those in Group B (12.0% and 6.9%, respectively). Conclusion: A beneficial effect of a single dose of GnRH agonist administration as a luteal phase supporting agent is yet to be determined because of the wide heterogeneity of data present in literature. Well-designed randomized clinical studies are required to clarify any effect of luteal GnRH agonist addition on pregnancy outcome measures with different doses, timing, and administration routes of GnRH agonists.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A novel approach using a minimal number of injections during the IVF/ICSI cycle: Luteal half-dose depot GnRH agonist following corifollitropin alfa versus the corifollitropin alfa with a GnRH-antagonist cycle
    (2016) Haydardedeoglu, Bulent; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 27651724; AAK-8872-2021
    Objective: Corifollitropin alfa is a good choice for assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles because fewer injections are needed than with other agents. In this retrospective cohort, we analyzed luteal injected half-dose depot gonadotropin hormone-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist cycles in women who received corifollitropin alfa and those who underwent a conventional corifollitropin alfa cycle with a GnRH antagonist. Material and Methods: In this retrospective cohort, we analyzed luteal injected half-dose depot GnRH agonist cycles in women who received corifollitropin alfa and those who underwent a conventional corifollitropin alfa cycle with a GnRH antagonist at the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and IVF Unit, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Baskent University School of Medicine, Adana, Turkey, from March 2014 to August 2015. The patient's baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Forty-five patients underwent the long protocol, in which a half-dose of depot GnRH agonist was administered on day 21 of the preceding cycle. Forty-nine patients underwent the GnRH-antagonist protocol. Corifollitropin alfa was administered on the menstrual cycle day 3. Results: The mean ages of the two groups were similar (32.77+/-5.55 vs. 34.2+/-4.51 years ["for the long-and antagonist-protocol groups, respectively"]). The total number of retrieved oocytes, the fertilization rate, and the number of transferred embryos were similar between the two groups. The only significant difference between the two protocols was the number of injections during the controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) cycle, which included the depot-agonist injection in the long-protocol group (4.46+/-1.64 vs. 5.71+/-2.51, p=0.006). The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates were similar in the two protocols (16/45 [35.6%] vs. 16/49 [32.7%] for the intention to treat and 32.5+/-6.82% vs. 36.25+/-8.58%, respectively). Conclusion: Our results show that ART cycles could be performed with fewer injections using corifollitropin alfa and a half-dose of depot GnRH agonist.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Effect of pigtail catheter application on obstetric outcomes in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancies following hyperstimulation syndrome
    (2017) Aytac, Pinar Caglar; Kalayci, Hakan; Yetkinel, Selcuk; Alkas, Didem; Simsek, Seda Yuksel; Haydardedeoglu, Bulent; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 28913144
    Objective: To evaluate the effects of percutaneous pigtail catheter drainage on the outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) pregnancies following moderate or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 189 patients hospitalized for OHSS following ICSI treatment in a tertiary in vitro fertilization unit between 2006 and 2014. Pigtail catheters were applied in 63 patients; the other 126 patients did not need that treatment. The obstetric reports of 173 patients could be accessed and were examined to investigate the pregnancy outcomes of those with and without catheters. Results: No complications such as infection or vascular or intra-abdominal organ trauma were observed related to the pigtail application. There were no differences in abortus, preterm labor, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preeclampsia ratio between the pigtail and control groups (p>0.05). The rate of readmission to hospital for OHSS was lower in the pigtail group than in the control group although not statistically significant (p=0.08). Conclusion: Pigtail application is a safe and effective method for draining ascites in patients with OHSS after ICSI treatment. The use of pigtail catheters had no adverse effects on the perinatal outcomes of patients hospitalized with OHSS who became pregnant after ICSI treatment. In addition, the percutaneous drainage of ascites via a pigtail catheter helped prevent the readmission of patients with moderate or severe OHSS.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection after preinstillation of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist in the uterine cavity just before embryo transfer
    (2017) Aytac, Pinar Caglar; Haydardedeoglu, Bulent; Ozdemir, Halis; Kilicdag, Esra Bulgan; 0000-0002-9194-8504; 0000-0002-0942-9108; 28913141; AAC-9940-2020; AAF-1643-2020; AAK-8872-2021
    Objective: To evaluate the effects of a gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) injection prior to embryo transfer on implantation and pregnancy rate. Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) therapy with and without GnRHa preinstallation into the uterine cavity just before embryo transfer between January 2012 and March 2013 in a single IVF center of a university hospital. Patients were evaluated based upon implantation, pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates. Results: GnRHa was injected into the uterine cavity of 108 patients prior to embryo transfer which were regarded as study group. One thousand forty-seven patients who were not injected GnRHa were regarded as the control group. Pregnancy rates were 44.4% and 41.7% in the GnRHa and control groups, respectively. Live birth rates were 27.8% and 26.1%, miscarriage rates were 15.7% and 15.7%, and implantation rates were 31% and 30%, respectively and there were no difference between groups statistically (p>0.05). Conclusion: No statistically significant differences in implantation, pregnancy, live birth, or miscarriage rates were observed in patients treated with GnRHa prior to embryo transfer, relative to the controls. Therefore, GnRHa injection into the uterine cavity prior to embryo transfer is not recommended as a means of increasing implantation or pregnancy rates in IVF. However, prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to clarify the effect of GnRHa instillation in the uterine cavity for embryo implantation in IVF.