Wos İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/4807
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Effect of Induced Membrane on Guided Bone Regeneration in an Experimental Calvarial Model(2020) Altiparmak, Nur; Akdeniz, Sidika Sinem; Akcay, Eda Yilmaz; Bayram, Burak; Araz, Kenan; 0000-0001-6831-9585; 31934967; AAK-1960-2021Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of induced membrane on guided bone regeneration and to compare its effect with poly-tetra-flourur-ethylene (PTFE) membrane and collagen membrane. Methods: Sixteen white Vienna rabbits were used for experiments. Initially 1 defect was created on the parietal bone of all animals and cement was placed inside the defects. After 8 weeks, the bone cements were removed, without damaging the induced membrane formed in the defect cavity. And then 2 more defects were created. All defects were filled with xsenogenic graft materials and were covered with newly formed induced membrane, d-PTFE membrane and collagen membrane. Eight animals were sacrificed at 4th week and other 8 animals were sacrificed at 8th week and all bone specimens were histologically evaluated. Results: New bone formation and bone marrow ratios were significantly higher in induced membrane and d-PTFE membrane group compared to collagen membrane group (P < 0.05) at 4th week. Mature bone ratios were significantly higher in induced membrane and d-PTFE membrane group compared to collagen membrane group (P < 0.05) at 8th week. The best CD31 value was detected with d-PTFE membrane group at 4th week and with induced membrane at 8th week. Conclusion: Induced membrane can act as a strong barrier membrane and stimulate bone regeneration. Induced membrane technique can be accepted as a good alternative for the reconstruction of critical size defects in maxillofacial region.Item Comparison of Success Rate of Dental Implants Placed in Autogenous Bone Graft Regenerated Areas and Pristine Bone(2020) Altiparmak, Nur; Akdeniz, Sidika Sinem; Diker, Nurettin; Bayram, Burak; Uckan, Sina; 32282668Autogenous bone grafting still has been considered as the "gold standard" and wildly used in the case of alveolar bone reconstruction. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the success rate of implants placed in autogenous block augmented ridges and implants placed in pristine bone (PB). This study included 113 patients. Fifty-three patients were treated with autogenous block grafts and particulate bone, after 6 months of healing implant placements were performed in autogenous bone augmented (ABA) areas. In 60 patients implant placement was performed, with no need for grafting and implants were placed into the PB. Follow-up data (pain, mobility, exudation from peri-implant space, success rate, marginal bone resorption) were collected after 5 years of prosthetic loading. The cumulative implant success rate at the 5-year examination was 92.45% for the ABA group and 85% for PB group. There were 3 failed implants in the ABA group and 3 in PB group. Average marginal bone loss was 1.47 mm on ABA group and 1.58 mm on PB group. No statistically significant differences for pain, exudation from peri-implant space, implant mobility, implant success, peri-implant bone loss parameters, and patient satisfaction level were found between groups. The obtained data demonstrated that the success rate of implants placed in regenerated areas are very similar to the success rate of implants those placed in PB.Item Comparison of Tunnel and Crestal Incision Techniques in Reconstruction of Localized Alveolar Defects(2017) Altiparmak, Nur; Uckan, Sina; Bayram, Burak; Soydan, Sidika; 28520823Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the complication rates of recipient sites prepared using two incision techniques: crestal and tunnel. Materials and Methods: In this prospective study, patients underwent augmentation procedures (68 patients; 75 sites) by the same surgeon that were performed consecutively using the crestal incision technique (27 horizontal, 10 vertical; crestal group) or the tunnel incision technique (27 horizontal, 11 vertical; tunnel group). Autogenous bone block grafts were harvested with a piezoelectric surgical device, and the grafts were fixed at the recipient sites by two titanium screws in both groups. The authors evaluated minor exposure, transient paresthesia, major exposure, permanent paresthesia, gingival recession at adjacent teeth, surgery time, and visual analog scale pain scores. Results: Soft tissue dehiscence and graft failure were significantly lower in patients undergoing the tunnel technique. Conclusion: The tunnel incision technique significantly decreased soft tissue exposure, the most common complication of augmentation procedures with autogenous onlay bone grafts. This technique should be considered an alternative to the crestal incision technique for preparation of the recipient site.