Browsing by Author "Yilmaz, Ismail"
Now showing 1 - 10 of 10
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Administration of paracetamol versus dipyrone by intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain relief in children after tonsillectomy(2015) Sener, Mesut; Kocum, Aysu; Caliskan, Ebru; Yilmaz, Ismail; Caylakli, Fatma; Aribogan, Anis; 25443442Background and objective: We compared the efficacy of intravenous (iv) paracetamol versus dipyrone via patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain relief in children. Methods: The study was composed of 120 children who had undergone elective tonsillectomy after receiving general anesthesia. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the dosage of postoperative intravenous-patient-controlled analgesia: paracetamol, dipyrone, or placebo. Pain was evaluated using a 0- to 100-mm visual analog scale and 1- to 4-pain relief score at 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24h postoperatively. Pethidine (0.25 mg kg 1) was administered intravenously to patients requiring rescue analgesia. Pethidine requirements were recorded during the first 24h postoperatively, and treatment related adverse effects were noted. Results: Postoperative visual analog scale scores were significantly lower with paracetamol group compared with placebo group at 6h (p < 0.05), dipyrone group compared with placebo group at 30 min and 6 h (p <0.05). No significant differences regarding visual analog scale values at 1, 2, 4, 12, and 24h were found. No significant differences were found between groups with respect to pain relief score (p >0.05). Postoperative pethidine requirements were significantly lower with paracetamol and dipyrone groups compared with placebo group (62.5%, 68.4% vs 90%, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between groups with respect to nausea, vomiting and the any other adverse effects of the drugs (p >0.05). Conclusions: Paracetamol and dipyrone have well tolerability profile and effective analgesic properties when administered iv-PCA for postoperative analgesia in children after tonsillectomy. (C) 2013 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.Item Auditory Brainstem Implant in Postlingual Postmeningitic Patients(2016) Bayazit, Yildirim; Kosaner, Julie; Celenk, Fatih; Somdas, Mehmet; Yilmaz, Ismail; Altin, Gokhan; Cevizci, Rasit; Yavuz, Haluk; Ozluoglu, Levent; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3320-204X; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-0237; 26485185; F-6315-2015; AAI-8020-2021Objectives/HypothesisThe aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of postlingual postmeningitic patients who received an auditory brainstem implant (ABI). Study DesignRetrospective analysis was performed on postlingual postmeningitic patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss who underwent ABI between the years 2007 and 2014 MethodsAll patients were postlingually deaf due to cochlear ossification as a consequence of bacterial meningitis. The patients received a MED-EL or Neurelec ABI. All patients were operated on at different hospitals by the same primary surgeon. The patients were tested using Ling 5 sound detection, sound field implant thresholds between 250 Hz and 6 kHz, and 6 to 12 choice closed-set word and sentence tests. ResultsNine patients with postmeningitic cochlear ossification received an ABI. Five of nine ABI users (55.5%) wear their audio processors (AP) most of the time. Four (44.5%) with no perceivable benefit have become nonusers. Three of the five consistent ABI users reported good benefit. The other two ABI users who do wear their APs do not respond to sound in daily living but reported benefits such as feeling sound in a good way. ConclusionsIn this study, five of nine patients (55.5%) with bilateral ossified cochlea had some degree of benefit from their ABI. An ABI may be useful in hearing restoration in postlingual patients with bilateral ossified cochlea due to meningitis. However, poor results may be related to side effects, which may necessitate deactivation of electrodes, long duration of auditory deprivation, or impairments in the auditory neural structures as a result of meningitis. Level of Evidence4. Laryngoscope, 126:1889-1892, 2016Item Cochlear Implant Failure in the Pediatric Population(2021) Ozer, Fulya; Yavuz, Haluk; Yilmaz, Ismail; Ozluoglu, Levent N.; 0000-0003-3320-204X; 34551468; F-6315-2015Background and Objectives: In cochlear implant (CI) surgery, the results and causes of revision and reimplantation may guide surgeons in establishing surgical protocols for revision surgery with safe audiological outcomes. The aim of this study was to review our experience in terms of etiology, surgical strategy, and hearing outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent CI removal and reimplantation. Subjects and Methods: All patients received implants of the same brand. Pre and postoperative Categories of Auditory Performance score and aided free-field pure tone audiometry thresholds were noted. In vivo integrity tests were performed for each patient and the results of ex vivo tests of each implant were obtained from manufacturer. Results: A total of 149 CIs were placed in 121 patients aged <18 years. The revision rate in children was 6.7% (10/121 children). Six patients had a history of head injury leading to a hard failure. The causes of reimplantation in others were soft failure (n=1), electrode migration (n=1), infection (n=1), and other (n=1). All patients showed better or similar postreimplantation audiological performance compared with pre-reimplantation results. Conclusions: It is very important to provide a safe school and home environment and educate the family for reducing reimplantation due to trauma. Especially for active children, psychiatric consultation should be continued postoperatively.Item Comparing the Efficiencies of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy and Intratympanic Steroid Treatment for Sudden Hearing Loss(2020) Eski, Erkan; Babakurban, Seda; Yilmaz, Serkan; Yilmazer, Cuneyt; Erkan, Alper Nabi; Caylakli, Fatma; Yilmaz, Ismail; 0000-0002-4784-3342; 0000-0001-5067-4044; 0000-0002-7333-2896; 0000-0001-7138-1400; 32784167; AAD-5458-2021; AAI-8856-2021; AAP-7195-2020; H-1063-2019OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficiencies of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) and intratympanic steroid (ITS)treatment for idiopathic sudden sensonneural hearingloss (ISSHL). MATERIALS and METHODS: A total of 136 patients who were treated for ISSHL were reviewed fromthemedical records. All of the patients were given systemic steroid therapy (SST). Among them,33patients received HBOT and 36 patients received ITS treatment following SST. The starting time to treatment, risk factors, hearing level, hearing gain (HG), and recovery rate were evaluated from retrospectiverecords. RESULTS: No substantial change in HG was observed for either the HBOT or ITS treatment cohort (p>0.05). But the time to recovery was higher in the ITS treatment cohort (40%) than in theHBOT cohort (17%). The starting time to ITS treatment was 4 days (range: 1-30) and that to HBOT was 8 days (range:3-30). There was a significant difference in the starting time to treatment (Mann-Whitney U-test, p=0.043). Also, hearing loss in the HBOT group was significantly higher than in the ITS treatment group. A significant difference was observed before and after ITS treatment (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients compared with late-onset treatment, ITS may be more effective than HBO after SST failure. It can be used as salvage therapy in patients with ISSHL who are unresponsive to a primary systemic steroid. We observed that HBOT didnot improve results when it was started late. Therefore, more studies that include both ITS treatment and HBOTas anearly treatment option are needed.Item Complications of Formaldehyde Injection for a Cystic Mass of the Neck(2018) Caylakli, Fatma; Yilmaz, Ismail; Alkan, Ozlem; 30197813Formaldehyde is a colorless reactive chemical with suffocating and pungent odor. It is irritant to mucous membranes and can enter the body by either oral ingestion or inhalation. Formaldehyde is toxic to living tissue. In this report, we present the case of a 22-year-old woman who was treated with formaldehyde injection for a cystic mass of the neck with developing complications.Item Effect of Functional Septorhinoplasty with Concha Bullosa Resection on Sinonasal Symptoms(2023) Inan, Serhat; Gultekin, Goknil; Yilmaz, Ismail; Buyuklu, Adnan Fuat; 0000-0001-8821-4481; 0000-0002-9001-7812; 36196949Objective To evaluate the impact of functional septorhinoplasty (SRP) with and without concha bullosa resection (CBR) on sinonasal symptoms and nasal obstruction severity using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) scale. Methods Consecutive adult participants who underwent SRP were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (SRPwCB) underwent SRP with CBR (bulbous or extensive type MTs), and Group 2 (SRPO) underwent SRP only (normal or lamellar-type MTs). The NOSE and SNOT-22 scales were assessed preoperatively and at the 3-month follow-up evaluation. Patient demographics, self-reported outcomes, nasoseptal angle (NSA), and Lund-Mackay scores (LMS) were analyzed. Results There were 119 participants (SRPwCB n = 57; SPRO n = 62). There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, allergy, smoking, LMS, and NSA according to the presence of MTCB. Compared to SRPO, SRPwCB patients had significantly higher preoperative NOSE and SNOT-22 scores, whereas their postoperative NOSE and SNOT-22 scores were similar. SRPwCB patients also had significantly more postnasal discharge, ear fullness, facial pain/pressure, poor sleep, night waking, daytime fatigue, sense of taste/smell, and blockage symptoms before surgery compared with SRPO patients. Conclusion SRPwCB patients had higher nasal obstruction and sinonasal symptom scores and greater improvement after surgery than SRPO patients. Therefore, evaluating the middle turbinate before functional SRP may be an important for surgical treatment of sinonasal symptoms. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 2022Item Effect of Nasal Packs in Septoplasty(2015) Eski, Erkan; Yilmaz, Ismail; 0000-0002-4784-3342; 0000-0002-1694-7608; 26052044; AAD-5458-2021; AAJ-2992-2021Item Overview of Pediatric Peripheral Facial Nerve Paralysis: Analysis of 40 Patients(2015) Ozkale, Yasemin; Erol, Ilknur; Saygi, Semra; Yilmaz, Ismail; 0000-0002-8522-5078; 0000-0003-3009-336X; 0000-0002-3530-0463; 0000-0002-1694-7608; 24810082; AAB-1203-2021; AAL-6136-2021; AAK-4825-2021; AAJ-2992-2021Peripheral facial nerve paralysis in children might be an alarming sign of serious disease such as malignancy, systemic disease, congenital anomalies, trauma, infection, middle ear surgery, and hypertension. The cases of 40 consecutive children and adolescents who were diagnosed with peripheral facial nerve paralysis at Baskent University Adana Hospital Pediatrics and Pediatric Neurology Unit between January 2010 and January 2013 were retrospectively evaluated. We determined that the most common cause was Bell palsy, followed by infection, tumor lesion, and suspected chemotherapy toxicity. We noted that younger patients had generally poorer outcome than older patients regardless of disease etiology. Peripheral facial nerve paralysis has been reported in many countries in America and Europe; however, knowledge about its clinical features, microbiology, neuroimaging, and treatment in Turkey is incomplete. The present study demonstrated that Bell palsy and infection were the most common etiologies of peripheral facial nerve paralysis.Item Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Selective Immunglobulin A Deficiency(2017) Eski, Erkan; Usta, Belgin Emine; Asilsoy, Suna; Yilmaz, Ismail; 0000-0002-4784-3342; 29392049; AAD-5458-2021; AAM-7975-2020Objective: To assess hearing functions in pediatric patients with selective immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency (SIGAD). Methods: Pure-tone audiometry, acoustic impedance, otoacoustic emission, and brainstem audiometric measurements were taken during a non-infectious period in 28 patients with SIGAD and 28 healthy children with normal otoscopic examination. The results of the hearing tests were compared between the two groups. Results: Two male patients and one female patient in the SIGAD group were found to have sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, a comparison of the average pure tone cut-off values at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz did not reveal any statistically significant difference between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Pediatric patients with SIGAD may exhibit SNHL at certain frequencies and require follow-up for the potential development of hearing loss.Item Short-Term Results of Neurelec Digisonic SP Cochlear Implantation in Prelingually Deafened Children(2014) Senkal, Ozgul Akin; Hizal, Evren; Yavuz, Haluk; Yilmaz, Ismail; Ozluoglu, Levent Naci; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3554-8274; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9699-6783; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3320-204X; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1694-7608; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2150-0237; 23749057; F-9493-2013; A-5853-2018; F-6315-2015; AAJ-2992-2021; AAI-8020-2021This paper examines the reports on the selection criteria and the post-operative performance of 25 children implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic SP. This study reported benefits from Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant in auditory and speech perception outcomes. There has been a lack of studies into the additional factors such as level of the mothers' education and bilingualism, which is a factor that may have a significant effect on the success of cochlear implantation. This paper examines the reports on the reasons for the differences in performance and the post-operative performance of 25 children implanted with the Neurelec Digisonic SP. Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and Meaningful Use of Speech Scale questionnaires were used just before 3, 6, 12, and 18 months following implantation. Electrode array was inserted without difficulty in all cases, with no complications to date. This is a retrospective and cross-sectional study and all the data were collected between March 2010 and December 2012. Auditory performance improved over time for up to 12 months after implantation. Our experience indicates that the Neurelec Digisonic SP cochlear implant system in children under the age of two is relatively safe and reliable. The Neurelec Digisonic SP device surgery can be performed without complications. Auditory performance results support the effectiveness of early implantation. These important findings further support the importance of professionals working very closely with parents or especially mothers and enhancing their involvement in achieving therapy goals to develop auditory skills and speech in young children following cochlear implantation.