Browsing by Author "Yasar, Zehtiye Fusun"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

The Knowledge Level of Dentists in Turkey About Their Potential Role on the Disaster Victims Identification (DVI) Team
(2019) Yasar, Zehtiye Fusun; Durukan, Elif; Buken, Erhan; 30417805
Objective Although dentists are valuable assets in identification teams during disaster events, forensic dentistry is not used effectively in the identification studies conducted in Turkey, and the importance of dental data is ignored. The aim of this study was to determine the level of knowledge of dentists regarding their duties and responsibilities during major disasters. Methods This descriptive study was conducted between December 2015 and June 2016. Registered dentists (n=20.280) of the Turkish Dental Association were invited to complete the organization's online survey. A total of 539 dentists participated in the volunteer workshop. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 22.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY). The chi-square analysis was used to evaluate the knowledge level of dentists by group regarding disaster victim identification (DVI) - the process and procedure of recovering and identifying victims of major disasters (eg, earthquake, terrorist attack). Results The dentists included in the study consisted of 320 (59.4%) females and 219 (40.6%) males with a mean age of 37.4 +/- 12.6 years. The number of specialists and general dentists were 249 (45.6%) and 297 (54.4%), respectively; 249 (69.71%) dentists who had knowledge about forensic dentistry stated that they received this information during their formal training. The percentage of dentists who were aware of the existence of an organization of a disaster response operation in Turkey was 74.2%, but only 20.5% (n=110) had knowledge about DVI. We found that 92.9% (n=104) of these dentists believed that dentists should be included in the team for the identification of disaster victims. On the other hand, only half (52.3%) of the dentists with knowledge of DVI wanted to work on the identification teams. The majority (99.1%) considered DNA analysis to be the safest method for identification. Conclusion Our findings show that, although dentists know about the identification process, they do not have enough relevant knowledge. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2019;13:533-538)
A METHOD SUGGESTION TO MEASURE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMED CONSENT DURING TREATMENT PROCESS A Study on University Students
(2019) Buken, Erhan; Yasar, Zehtiye Fusun; Zengin, Hatice Yagmur; Buken, Bora; 0000-0002-4779-0623; 0000-0002-9855-2449; AAL-6847-2021; ABA-3224-2021
It is difficult and subjective to evaluate how much of the treatment information given has been understood by the patient during the informing process. Various court decisions show that courts expect a hundred percent success in the informing process. This research was conducted to observe the effectiveness of written and verbal information given under ideal conditions. A coronary angiography consent form was standardized to measure readability and understandability. Two different labyrinth tests were performed from the text. Tests were performed on the Baskent University students in Turkey. The labyrinth test's subjects responded to the test after verbal information, had an absolute rate of 32.5% while the labyrinth test's subjects, responded to prior verbal information had an absolute success rate of 15%. 87.7% of those who achieved absolute success, in the second labyrinth test, also received verbal information. In the verbally informed group, those who achieved absolute success in the first test were 8.5%, while this rate increased to 28.5% after verbal information. There was no difference between the groups, in terms of the number of correct answers and response time, in the first test. Significant differences between the groups' tests arose in the test administered after being informed. This paper argues that the difference of total correct answers between the groups, in the post-test, stems from the effects of verbal informing. This study observed that verbally informing is more effective than written informing. It concludes that the success of the informing process can be measured by developing standardized methods, though it is unlikely to achieve 100% success.
A University Hospital Patients and Their Relatives' Opinions on Violence in Health
(2017) Yasar, Zehtiye Fusun; Durukan, Elif; Buken, Erhan; 0000-0002-4779-0623; 0000-0002-8579-5564; AAL-6847-2021; AAJ-8621-2021
Background. Currently, sectors rendering service for the public such as health, education transport and etc. are frequently exposed to violence without discriminating between age, gender, educational level and occupation. Within these sectors, health sector constitutes the most risky group because it generally renders service to individuals who are distressed and need care Aims. The study aimed to determine the opinions of patients and patient relatives s on violence against health professionals Methods: This descriptive study conducted in January-February 2015 and was implemented on 192 patients and patient relatives applied to a university hospital and who consented to participate the study. A questionnaire form was applied to the participants. IBM SPSS 22.0 statistical package program was used to analyze the data. Results. The mean age of the study participants was 41.3 +/- 13.7; 52,1 % were females and the educational level of 65.6% is university/doctorate level. Nearly 88% of patients stated that violence is not a method for seeking legal remedies, and they believed that it is wrong to use violence against the intervening doctor even in case where it was not possible to save the patient (91.7%). The participants stated that the cause of the increase in violence against health care workers; was related to lack of education of the patients and their relatives (73.2%) and was associated with longer waiting times in hospitals for examination (53.2%). Participants stated the reasons for getting angry in a healthcare facility as being ignored by healthcare professionals (76.6%) and failure in being informed about their patients' status. (54.2%). Thirteen (6.8%) of participants stated that they used violence against healthcare professionals and 7 of these stated that the incident took place in the emergency room. Conclusion. To prevent the violence cases, all individuals constituting the public, including patients/patient relatives and healthcare professionals should be trained. We think that presence of health care providers having high communication skills to communicate the individuals applied to health institution due to their illnesses and presence of effective security systems will contribute to solving of the problem.