Browsing by Author "Sert, Fatma"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

National Multi-Center Observational Retrospective Study to Understand Treatment Patterns and Outcomes for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in Turkey: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Study, STONE Trial
(2022) Onal, Cem; Demiral, Ayse Nur; Atalar, Banu; Yalman, Deniz; Dagoglu, Nergiz; Hurmuz, Pervin; Erpolat, Petek; Akyurek, Serap; Gul, Sute Karabulut; Berber, Tanju; Guler, Ozan Cem; Umay, Cenk; Sert, Fatma; Karahacioglu, Eray; Birgi, Sumerya Duru; Yaprak, Gokhan; Saglam, Esra Kaytan
This study investigated treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiotherapy (RT) in Turkey. We included 492 patients with stage III NSCLC in this multi-center retrospective study. Pa-tient demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical treatment patterns from the time of the initial diagnosis to disease progression were recorded. Additionally, the prognostic factors predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed. For the initial treatment, 429 patients (89.2%) received chemotherapy and RT, whereas 53 patients (10.8%) were treated only with RT. The first disease progression occurred in 288 patients (58.4%) at 9.3 months (median) after the initial treatment, and 64.6% re-ceived treatment after first progression. The second disease progression occurred in 30 patients, and 20 patients (66.7%) received treatment. Median OS and PFS were 27.0 months and 13.4 months, respectively. Age (p< 0.001), stage (p= 0.04), poor performance score (PS) (p= 0.03) and RT doses (p= 0.002) were independent predictors for OS and PFS in our multivariate analysis. Additional significant predictors for OS in the multivariate analysis were gender (p= 0.004), treatment period (0.02), and irradiation technique (p= 0.02). Disease progression occurred in nearly 58% of the patients, and one-third of these patients remained untreated during the disease progression. These findings indicate a need for additional treatment options in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC with high-risk features, namely older age, stage IIIB disease, poor PS, and lower RT doses.
Restaging of Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Adjuvant Radiotherapy According to FIGO 2018 and Suggestions for the Next Staging: Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Gynecologic Group Study (TROD 04-004)
(2022) Alanyali, Senem; Balci, Beril; Esen, Caglayan Selenge Beduk; Gultekin, Melis; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Ozkurt, Selnur; Ergen, Sefika Arzu; Gursel, Sukriye Bilge; Cetin, Ilknur Alsan; Sert, Fatma; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Ibis, Kamuran; Onal, Cem; Sahinler, Ismet; Yildiz, Ferah; Ozsaran, Zeynep
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 and 2018 staging systems in patients with uterine cervical cancer. METHODS Medical records of 571 patients who were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy between 2001 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates according to FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018 staging systems were compared using the log-rank test. Cox regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 59 months. Five-year OS and PFS rates were 81.1% and 77.7%, respectively. Stage migration was recorded in 401 patients (70.2%) and the most remarkable stage migration was detected in stage I patients (60%). A total of 157 (27.5%) patients upstaged to stage IIIC disease. According to FIGO 2009, 5-year OS rates were 87.3%, 80.5% (p=0.076), and PFS rates were 82.8%, 77.5% (p=0.036) for stage IB1 and IB2, respectively. According to FIGO 2018, the 5-year OS rates for stage IB1, IB2, and IB3 were 89.8%, 87.1%, and 81.4% (p=0.310), and PFS rates were 90.2%, 80.5%, and 80.1% (p=0.189), respectively. Patients with >= 2 pelvic lymph node (LN) metastases had worse 5-year OS and PFS rates than patients with one metastasis (p=0.015 and p=0.006). Number of para-aortic LN metastasis and metastatic LN ratio (MLNR) were also correlated with 5-year OS and PFS. CONCLUSION Current FIGO staging system better discriminates patients with cervical cancer. However, integration of metastatic LN number and/or MLNR to the upcoming FIGO staging system may improve the prognostic value of the staging.
Treatment outcomes of prostate cancer patients with Gleason score 8-10 treated with definitive radiotherapy
(2019) Ozyigit, Gokhan; Onal, Cem; Igdem, Sefik; Alicikus, Zumre Arican; Iribas, Ayca; Akin, Mustafa; Yalman, Deniz; Cetin, Ilknur; Aksu, Melek Gamze; Atalar, Banu; Dincbas, Fazilet; Hurmuz, Pervin; Guler, Ozan Cem; Aydin, Barbaros; Sert, Fatma; Yildirim, Cumhur; Gorken, Ilknur Birkay; Agaoglu, Fulya Yaman; Korcum, Aylin Fidan; Yüce, Deniz; Ozkok, Serdar; Darendeliler, Emin; Akyol, Fadil; 31143994
Purpose To validate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients with Gleason score (GS) 8-10 disease treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)+ androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in the modern era. Methods Institutional databases of biopsy proven 641 patients with GS 8-10 PCa treated between 2000 and 2015 were collected from 11 institutions. In this multi-institutional Turkish Radiation Oncology Group study, a standard database sheet was sent to each institution for patient enrollment. The inclusion criteria were, T1-T3N0M0 disease according to AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) 2010 Staging System, no prior diagnosis of malignancy, at least 70Gy total irradiation dose to prostate +/- seminal vesicles delivered with either three-dimensional conformal RT or intensity-modulated RT and patients receiving ADT. Results The median follow-up time was 5.9 years (range 0.4-18.2 years); 5-year overall survival (OS), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 88%, 78%, and 79%, respectively. Higher RT doses (>= 78Gy) and longer ADT duration (>= 2 years) were significant predictors for improved DMFS, whereas advanced stage was a negative prognosticator for DMFS in patients with GS 9-10. Conclusions Our results validated the fact that oncologic outcomes after radical EBRT significantly differ in men with GS 8 versus those with GS 9-10 prostate cancer. We found that EBRT dose was important predictive factor regardless of ADT period. Patients receiving 'non-optimal treatment' (RT doses <78Gy and ADT period <2 years) had the worst treatment outcomes.