Browsing by Author "Saricaoglu, Elif Mukime"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Evaluation of extensively drug-resistant gram-negative bacteremia among solid-organ transplant recipients: a multicenter study
    (2021) Yanik Yalcin, Tugba; Azap, Ozlem; Kose, Adam; Bayindir, Yasar; Saricaoglu, Elif Mukime; Cinar, Gule; Uygun Kizmaz, Yesim; Kursun, Ebru; Aliskan, Hikmet Eda; Tezer Tekce, Yasemin; Eren Kutsoylu, Oya Ozlem; Egeli, Tufan; Ari, Alpay; Albayrak, Yurdagul; Cabadak, Hatice; Deniz, Secil; Demir Onder, Kubra; Kizilates, Filiz; Ozger, Selcuk; Guzel Tunccan, Ozlem; Haberal, Mehmet; 0000-0001-9060-3195; 0000-0002-3462-7632; 33865241; AAE-2282-2021; AAJ-8097-2021
    Background/aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the distribution, sources, clinical features, and mortality rates of bacteremia due to evaluation of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) gram negative among solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients. Materials and methods: A retrospective study of SOT recipients with bacteremia due to XDR gram-negative pathogens in 11 centers between 2016 and 2018 was conducted. Patients' records were evaluated. Results: Of 171 bacteremia that occurred in 164 SOT recipients, 93 (56.7%) were liver, 46 (28%) kidney, 14 (8.5%) heart, and 11 (6.7%) lung recipients. Bacteremia episodes were recorded in the first year in 63.7% of the patients (n = 109), early-onset bacteremia was recorded in 45% (n = 77) of the episodes. In multivariate analysis, catheter-associated bacteremia was an independent risk factor for 7-day mortality (p = 0.037), and early-onset bacteremia was found as an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality (p = 0.017). Conclusion: Difficult-to-treat infections due to XDR bacteria in SOT recipients shadow the success of transplantation. Central venous catheters seem to be the main risk factor. Judicious use of medical devices is of pivotal importance.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society (KLIMIK) Evidence-Based Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brucellosis, 2023
    (2023) Simsek-Yavuz, Serap; Ozger, Selcuk; Benli, Aysun; Ates, Can; Aydin, Mehtap; Aygun, Gokhan; Azap, Alpay; Azap, Ozlem; Basaran, Seniha; Demirturk, Nese; Ergonul, Onder; Kocagul-Celikbas, Aysel; Kuscu, Ferit; Saricaoglu, Elif Mukime; Sayin-Kutlu, Selda; Turker, Nesrin; Turkoglu-Yilmaz, Emine
    Although brucellosis is very common in the world and Turkiye, there are no evidence-based guidelines to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This guide has been prepared by the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to provide evidence-based recommendations to physicians from different specialties interested in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis. The recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide Development Guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were taken as the basis for preparing this guide. The guideline preparation group determined 20 questions considered to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, and the publications that could answer these questions prepared in PICO (Population/Patient [P], Intervention [I], Comparison [C], Outcome [O]) format, were searched in ULAKBIM Tr Dizin, PubMed, Cochrane databases without date restrictions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to rank the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations for each PICO question and for each individual outcome. Meta-analyses of comparative clinical studies were performed to answer the PICO questions. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses with data obtained from case reports and case series were conducted in the absence of comparative clinical studies. It is planned to update the recommendations at regular intervals in line with the results of new studies.