Browsing by Author "Salman, Coskun"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3

Could the Long-Term Oncological Safety of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer also Be Valid for the High-Intermediate- and High-Risk Patients? A Multi-Center Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study Conducted with 2745 Endometrial Cancer Cases. (TRSGO-End-001)
(2021) Vardar, Mehmet Ali; Guzel, Ahmet Baris; Taskin, Salih; Gungor, Mete; Ozgul, Nejat; Salman, Coskun; Kucukgoz-Gulec, Umran; Khatib, Ghanim; Taskiran, Cagatay; Duender, Ilkkan; Ortac, Firat; Yuce, Kunter; Terek, Cosan; Simsek, Tayup; Ozsaran, Aydin; Onan, Anil; Coban, Gonca; Topuz, Samet; Demirkiran, Fuat; Takmaz, Ozguc; Kose, M. Faruk; Gocmen, Ahmet; Seydaoglu, Gulsah; Gumurdulu, Derya; Ayhan, Ali; 34898563
This study was conducted to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of laparotomy and laparoscopic surgeries in endometrial cancer under the light of the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, with particular focus on the high-intermediate- and high-risk categories. Using multicentric databases between January 2005 and January 2016, disease-free and overall survivals of 2745 endometrial cancer cases were compared according to the surgery route (laparotomy vs. laparoscopy). The high-intermediate- and high-risk patients were defined with respect to the 2016 ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification system, and they were analyzed with respect to differences in survival rates. Of the 2745 patients, 1743 (63.5%) were operated by laparotomy, and the remaining were operated with laparoscopy. The total numbers of high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases were 734 (45%) patients in the laparotomy group and 307 (30.7%) patients in the laparoscopy group. Disease-free and overall survivals were not statistically different when compared between laparoscopy and laparotomy groups in terms of low-, intermediate-, high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. In conclusion, regardless of the endometrial cancer risk category, long-term oncological outcomes of the laparoscopic approach were found to be comparable to those treated with laparotomy. Our results are encouraging to consider laparoscopic surgery for high-intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer cases.
OPEC Study: An International Multicenter Study Of Ovarian Preservation In Endometrial Cancers
(2022) Akgor, Utku; Ayhan, Ali; Shushkevich, Alexander; Ozdal, Bulent; Angelou, Kyveli; Akbayir, Ozgur; Kaidarova, Dilyara; Ulrikh, Elena; Stepanyan, Artem; Ortac, Firat; Aliyev, Shamistan; Ozgul, Nejat; Taranenka, Siarhei; Haberal, Ali; Salman, Coskun; Seyhan, Alper; Selcuk, Ilker; Haidopoulos, Dimitrios; Akilli, Huseyin; Bolatbekova, Raikhan; Alaverdyan, Areg; Taskin, Salih; Murshudova, Sabina; Batur, Meltem; Berlev, Igor; Gultekin, Murat; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-8441; 35323994; AAX-3230-2020
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and oncological safety of ovarian preservation in early stage endometrial adenocarcinoma (EC) patients aged 40 and below. Methods A total of 11 institutions from eight countries participated in the study. 169 of 5898 patients aged <= 40 years were eligible for the study. Patients with EC treated between March 2007 and January 2019 were retrospectively assessed. Results The median duration of follow-up after EC diagnosis was 59 months (4-187). Among 169 participants, ovarian preservation surgery (OPS) was performed in 54 (31.9%), and BSO was performed in 115 (68.1%) patients. Although patients younger than 30 years of age were more likely to have OPS than patients aged 30 to 40 years (20.4% vs. 9.6%, P = 0.021), there was no significant difference by the mean age. There were no other relevant baseline differences between OPS and BSO groups. The Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed no difference in either the overall survival (P = 0.955) or recurrence-free survival (P = 0.068) among patients who underwent OPS, and BSO. Conclusion OPS appears to be safe without having any adverse impact on survival in women aged <= 40 years with FIGO Stage I EC.
SATEN III-Splitting Adjuvant Treatment of stage III ENdometrial cancers: an international, multicenter study
(2019) Kahramanoglu, Ilker; Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu; Taranenka, Siarhei; Ayhan, Ali; Salman, Coskun; Sanci, Muzaffer; Demirkan, Fuat; Ortac, Fırat; Haidopoulos, Dimitrios; Sukhin, Vladyslav; Kaidarova, Dilyara; Stepanyan, Artem; Farazaneh, Farah; Aliyev, Shamistan; Ulrikh, Elena; Kurdiani, Dina; Yalcin, Ibrahim; Mavrichev, Siarhei; Akilli, Huseyin; Sari, Mustafa Erkan; Pletnev, Andrei; Aslan, Koray; Bese, Tugan; Kairbayev, Murat; Vlachos, Dimitrios; Gultekin, Murat; 31481453
Introduction The purposes of this study were to compare adjuvant treatment modalities and to determine prognostic factors in stage III endometrioid endometrial cancer (EC). Methods SATEN III was a retrospective study involving 13 centers from 10 countries. Patients who had been operated on between 1998 and 2018 and diagnosed with stage III endometrioid EC were analyzed. Results A total of 990 women were identified; 317 with stage IIIA, 18 with stage IIIB, and 655 with stage IIIC diseases. The median follow-up was 42 months. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with stage III EC by adjuvant treatment modality was 68.5% for radiotherapy (RT), 54.6% for chemotherapy (CT), and 69.4% for chemoradiation (CRT) (p=0.11). The 5-year overall survival (OS) for those patients was 75.6% for RT, 75% for CT, and 80.7% for CRT (p=0.48). For patients with stage IIIA disease treated by RT versus CT versus CRT, the 5-year OS rates were 75.6%, 75.0%, and 80.7%, respectively (p=0.48). Negative peritoneal cytology (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.23 to 0.86; p=0.02) and performance of lymphadenectomy (HR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.77, p=0.001) were independent predictors for improved OS for stage IIIA EC. For women with stage IIIC EC treated by RT, CT, and CRT, the 5-year OS rates were 78.9%, 67.0%, and 69.8%, respectively (p=0.08). Independent prognostic factors for better OS for stage IIIC disease were age <60 (HR: 0.50, 95%CI: 0.36 to 0.69, p<0.001), grade 1 or 2 disease (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.94, p=0.014; and HR: 0.65, 95%CI: 0.46 to 0.91, p=0.014, respectively), absence of cervical stromal involvement (HR: 063, 95% CI: 0.46 to 0.86, p=0.004) and performance of para-aortic lymphadenectomy (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.72, p<0.001). Discussion Although not statistically significant, CRT seemed to be a better adjuvant treatment option for stage IIIA endometrioid EC. Systematic lymphadenectomy seemed to improve survival outcomes in stage III endometrioid EC.