Browsing by Author "Saka, Burcu"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    THE POTENTIAL PROGNOSTIC ROLE OF PERITUMORAL EOSINOPHILS WITHIN WHOLE TUMOR-ASSOCIATED INFLAMMATORY CELLS AND STROMAL HISTOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN COLORECTAL CANCER
    (2020) Ramadan, Saime; Saka, Burcu; Yarikkaya, Enver; Bilici, Ahmet; Oncel, Mustafa; 33112111
    We aimed to determine the prognostic role of whole tumor-associated inflammatory cells, especially eosinophils, and stromal histological characteristics in relation to other prognostic parameters in patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC). A total of 122 patients who underwent an operation for CRC were included in this retrospective study. Conventional (tumor grade, TNM stage and venous invasion [VI]) and other histopathological (intratumoral/peritumoral budding {ITB/PTB], desmoplasia) tumor parameters were recorded and classified by density, as were the tumor-associated inflammatory parameters (intratumoral/peritumoral lymphocytes {ITL/PTL], eosinophils [IE/PTE], overall inflammation [ITI/PTI], Crohn-like inflammation [CLI]). Cancer-specific survival data were analyzed with respect to all tumor parameters. High ITB and PTB were significantly correlated with a higher rate of pT4, VI and desmoplasia (p < 0.05). An association of moderate ITL and extensive PTL with lesser likelihood of VI and metastasis; an association of extensive CLI with a significantly lower rate of metastasis and TNM stage IV; and minimal PTE with a significantly higher rate of pT4 stage, metastasis and ITB were detected (p < 0.05 for each). Our findings revealed that low score tumoral budding and an increase in tumor-related inflammation were associated with lesser likelihood of poor prognostic tumor parameters. Nonetheless, given the association of an increase in PTE with lesser likelihood of ITB, pT4, metastasis, and with non-significantly for better survival rates, our findings emphasize the potential role of peritumoral eosinophils as an additional prognostic parameter in CRC.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A Retrospective Evaluation of the Epithelial Changes/Lesions and Neoplasms of the Gallbladder in Turkey and a Review of the Existing Sampling Methods: A Multicentre Study
    (2018) Ozgun, Gonca; Esendaglı, Guldal; Akarca, F. Goknur; Balci, Serdar; Argon, Asuman; Sengiz Erhan, Selma; Turhan, Nesrin; Ince Zengin, Neslihan; Hallac Keser, Sevinc; Celik, Betul; Bulut, Tangul; Abdullazade, Samir; Erden, Esra; Savas, Berna; Bostan, Temmuz; Sagol, Ozgul; Aysal Agalar, Anil; Kepil, Nuray; Karslioglu, Yildirim; Gunal, Armagan; Markoc, Fatma; Saka, Burcu; Ozdamar, Sukru Oguz; Bahadir, Burak; Kaymaz, Esin; Isik, Emre; Ayhan, Semin; Tuncel, Deniz; Ozguven Yilmaz, Banu; Celik, Sevinc; Karabacak, Tuba; Erbarut Seven, Ipek; Ataizi Celikel, Cigdem; Gucin, Zuhal; Ekinci, Ozgur; Akyol, Gulen; 28984336
    Objective: As there is continuing disagreement among the observers on the differential diagnosis between the epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms of the gallbladder, this multicentre study was planned in order to assess the rate of the epithelial gallbladder lesions in Turkey and to propose microscopy and macroscopy protocols. Material and Method: With the participation of 22 institutions around Turkey that were included in the Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Study Group, 89,324 cholecystectomy specimens sampled from 2003 to 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The numbers of adenocarcinomas, dysplasias, intracholecystic neoplasms/adenomas, intestinal metaplasias and reactive atypia were identified with the review of pathology reports and the regional and countrywide incidence rates were presented in percentages. Results: Epithelial changes/lesions were reported in 6% of cholecystectomy materials. Of these epithelial lesions, 7% were reported as adenocarcinoma, 0.9% as high-grade dysplasia, 4% as low-grade dysplasia, 7.8% as reactive/regenerative atypia, 1.7% as neoplastic polyp, and 15.6% as intestinal metaplasia. The remaining lesions (63%) primarily included non-neoplastic polypoids/hyperplastic lesions and antral/pyloric metaplasia. There were also differences between pathology laboratories. Conclusion: The major causes of the difference in reporting these epithelial changes/lesions and neoplasms include the differences related to the institute's oncological surgery frequency, sampling protocols, geographical dissimilarities, and differences in the diagnoses/interpretations of the pathologists. It seems that the diagnosis may change if new sections are taken from the specimen when any epithelial abnormality is seen during microscopic examination of the cholecystectomy materials.