Browsing by Author "Polat-Ozsoy, Omur"

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7

Comparative evaluation of periodontal effects and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded bonded retainers A prospective short-term study
(2020) Kartal, Yasemin; Kaya, Burcak; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur; 32780168
Purpose To prospectively compare the short-term periodontal effects and survival rates of mandibular lingual canine-to-canine Memotain (CA-Digital, Mettmann, Germany) and five-stranded bonded retainers. Methods In all, 52 patients requiring retention after orthodontic treatment were assigned to 2 study groups (n = 26 in each group). Retention was provided by Memotain retainers which were fabricated digitally using CAD-CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) technology in the first group and by five-stranded retainers which were fabricated manually using a conventional bending method in the second group. The patients were examined at the following time points: 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months. Plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, marginal recession, bleeding on probing, failure rate per tooth, and survival rate of retainer wires were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U, Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and chi(2) tests. Results The differences between the groups were nonsignificant for plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, marginal recession, bleeding on probing, failure rate per tooth and survival rate of retainer wires. Significant differences were observed within the groups throughout the follow-up period for plaque index and probing depth. The survival rates of retainer wires were 77% for the Memotain retainers and 73% for the five-stranded retainers for the 6-month follow-up period. Conclusions Periodontal outcomes and survival rates of Memotain and five-stranded mandibular lingual bonded retainers were similar. Furthermore, periodontal health was maintained and considerably high survival rates were achieved with both retainer types.
Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols
(2015) Yilmaz, Alev; Arman-Ozcirpici, Aya; Erken, Seda; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur; 25564504
Objective: This study evaluates the dentoskeletal effects of a mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion (MISME) appliance in comparison with two types of conventional expansion methods. Methods: Records of 42 patients with bilateral or unilateral posterior crossbite were included in this study. The patients were divided into three groups. In group 1, four miniscrews were placed to the palatal region and an acrylic expansion device was bonded on these screws. A bonded maxillary expansion appliance was used in group 2, while a banded expansion appliance was used in group 3. Measurements from cephalometric, postero-anterior radiographs, and dental casts taken before and after expansion were evaluated statistically. Results: ANB angle increased significantly in group 1 and 3. MISME group also showed an increase of SNA angle. Measurements regarding the vertical dimension did not change with MISME but significant posterior rotation was found in group 2 and 3. Overbite value showed a significant decrease in group 2 and 3, but remained stable in group 1. The nasal, maxillary, maxillary intermolar widths showed significant increases in all groups. The difference between MISME group and other groups in maxillary width was significant indicating more skeletal expansion in MISME group. The maxillary molars showed significant buccal tipping in group 2 and 3, while lingual tipping of molars was found in MISME group. Conclusions: MISME can be a better alternative to bonded expansion particularly in patients with vertical growth patterns and lack of anchorage teeth.
Effects of different orthodontic adhesives and resin removal techniques on enamel color alteration
(2014) Boncuk, Yasemen; Cehreli, Zafer C.; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur
Objective: To investigate the color alterations in enamel following the use of different orthodontic bonding resins and adhesive residue removal burs. Materials and Methods: Metal brackets were bonded to extracted human premolars (n = 175) by using an etch-and-rinse adhesive system, a self-etch adhesive system (SEP), or a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC). After 24 hours of photoaging, the brackets were removed and the adhesive residue on the tooth surfaces was cleaned with either a tungsten carbide bur or a Stainbuster bur. Tooth colors were measured with a spectrophotometer at baseline, after adhesive removal, and after additional photoaging. Color evaluation was made, and color differences induced by photoaging were calculated. Statistical evaluation was made using the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Mann-Whitney U-test, with Bonferroni correction. Results: All specimens showed discoloration at varying levels. The highest color change was observed in the etch-and-rinse adhesive/tungsten carbide bur group. When the etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives were used, adhesive-remnant removal with Stainbuster burs resulted in significantly lower discoloration. The type of bur did not affect the extent of enamel discoloration in the RMGIC group. Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment alters the original color of enamel, and both the adhesive system and the resin-removal methods are responsible for this change. When brackets are bonded with the etch-and-rinse system or the SEP, cleaning the adhesive residuals with Stainbuster burs is recommended for minimal change. RMGIC can be safely cleaned with tungsten carbide burs.
Effects of various analgesics on the level of prostaglandin E2 during orthodontic tooth movement
(2014) Tuncer, Zeynep; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur; Demirbilek, Muge; Bostanoglu, Ebru
AIM: The aim of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of preoperative/postoperative ibuprofen and acetaminophen use after bonding and to find a relation between the pain level and the amount of prostaglandin released. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were included and randomly divided to three equal groups that received either ibuprofen, acetaminophen or placebo for pain relief. The pain levels were measured before bonding, after bonding, at first, second, third, and seventh days on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) samples were collected at the same time intervals to measure the amount of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) released. PGE2 levels were determined with ELISA test. The results were evaluated with Wilcoxon and Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Acetaminophen and placebo groups showed similar pain levels during the first 2 days, whereas ibuprofen group showed lower pain levels during the first day after bonding. PGE2 levels did not show statistically significant difference in time within the analgesic groups. No significant relation between the pain perceived and PGE2 released was found. LIMITATIONS: The biggest limitation of this study is the subjective nature of pain and its method of evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of pain by patients taking ibuprofen and acetaminophen at pre/post appliance placement was not different from patients taking placebo. No time-related differences in PGE2 level were found between the groups and no significant correlation was found between the perception of pain and PGE2 levels.
External apical root resorption after nonextraction orthodontic treatment with labial vs. lingual fixed appliances
(2019) Pamukcu, Hande; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur; Gulsahi, Ayse; Ozemre, Mehmet Ozgur; 31792608
Objectives The aim of this retrospective study is to compare external apical root resorption (EARR) after labial and lingual fixed orthodontic treatment, as detected with panoramic radiographs. Materials and methods Sixty subjects were divided into two groups according to the treatment type: lingual (30 patients) and labial (30 patients) fixed orthodontic treatment. Panoramic radiographs which were obtained at the beginning of treatment (T0) and at the end of the treatment (T1) were evaluated. The maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors, as well as canine crown and root lengths were measured for T0 and T1. Crown to root ratios were used to determine EARR. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance and chi(2) analysis. Results In all, 5 patients (16.7%) in the lingual group and 7 patients (23.3%) in the labial group had a minimum of one tooth with severe EARR, while 9 patients (30%) in the lingual group and 14 patients (46.7%) in the labial group had no EARR. A total of 26 teeth (7.2%) in the lingual group and 34 teeth (9.4%) in the labial group developed severe EARR; however, 184 teeth (51.1%) in the lingual group and 202 teeth (56.1%) in the labial group did not reveal any EARR. No statistically significant difference was found for the resorption rates between the treatment groups (p> 0.05). Although not statistically significant, there was a higher percentage of severe EARR in the mandible within the labial group. Conclusions Both lingual and labial orthodontic techniques showed statistically similar root resorption rates. EARR is a multifactorial issue and individual predispositions must also be taken into consideration.
Maxillary Expansion Via Palatal Mini-Implants: A Preliminary Study
(2014) Arman-Ozcirpici, Ayca; Yilmaz, Alev; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur
Objective: This study evaluates the skeletal and dental effects of a mini-implant supported maxillary expansion (MISME) appliance that applied forces directly to the maxilla. Materials and Method: Records of 9 patients (5 female and 4 male patients; mean age = 12 years 8 months) with indications of maxillary expansion were included in this study. After insertion of four miniscrews (1.6 mm in diameter, 7 mm in length), an acrylic expansion device was bonded on the screws. Two miniscrews were placed in the anterior palate bilaterally, 3-4 mm lateral to the suture and 3-4 mm posterior to the incisive foramen. Two miniscrews were placed bilaterally between the second premolar and first molar roots in the palatal alveolus. The MISME appliance was activated with a semi-rapid protocol until the desired expansion was achieved. The average treatment duration was 97.1 +/- 62.2 days. Measurements from cephalometric, posteroanterior radiographs and dental casts taken before and after expansion were evaluated statistically. The nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used for not normally distributed parameters (i.e., Nperp-A), and the parametric paired t test was performed for normally distributed parameters. A finding of p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results: Forward movement of the maxilla (p<0.05) as well as an increase in nasal and maxillary skeletal and dental widths (p<0.001) were observed in the sample group. Maxillary intermolar, intercanine, and palatal widths also increased (p<0.001) without buccal tipping of molars. A slight posterior rotation of the mandible was seen. Dentoalveolar measurements did not show any significant changes. Conclusion: The MISME appliance showed successful expansion of the maxilla without such side effects as buccal tipping of molars and bite opening. This appliance, which provides parallel expansion, can be a simple and economic alternative to transpalatal distraction.
Short-Term Evaluation of Nasal Changes After Maxillary Surgery
(2014) Yilmaz, Alev; Polat-Ozsoy, Omur; Arman-Ozcirpici, Ayca; Uckan, Sina
Objective: To determine the nasal soft-tissue profile changes in skeletal Class III patients who underwent maxillary or bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Materials and Method: This clinical retrospective study consists of 40 patients (19 male and 21 female) who had undergone orthognathic surgery. All patients received single jaw maxillary (9 patients) or bimaxillary surgery (31 patients). Standardized lateral cephalograms obtained before operation and at least 6 months after the operation were used. Twelve measurements (4 skeletal and 8 soft-tissue measurements) were made. The distributions of the variables were checked by Shapiro-Wilk test. Paired-samples t test was used for parametric data and Wilcoxon sign rank test for nonparametric data, to analyze the differences between pre- and postoperative measurements. Results: After orthognathic surgery, SNA and ANB increased; SNB decreased significantly. A significant reduction in nasofrontal angle, TH-Prn, and nasal tip projection and a significant increase in nasofacial angle were found. In addition, superior movement of the nasal tip was found, and as a result, the nasal hump decreased. The N-Sn/Pr ratio, nasal tip angle, and nasolabial angle did not show any significant changes. Conclusion: It can be concluded that more vertical nasal changes rather than sagittal nasal changes are observed after maxillary surgery.