Browsing by Author "N. Nugent,"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Skin Substitutes as Treatment For Burn İnjuries
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2006-01) S. P. Fagan,; N. Nugent,; D. N. Herndon
    Over the last decades the mortality of severely burned patients decreased significantly. This is due to major achievements in burn surgery such as early resuscitation, improved respiratory management of inhalation injury, better control of infection, modulation of the hypermetabolic response after trauma, and to a vast amount the introduction of early burn wound excision and grafting. Early burn wound excision has been shown to have several benefits in severely burned patients, such as decreased operative blood loss, decreased length of hospital stay, fewer septic complications, and decreased mortality in non-elderly adult burned patients. But especially severely burned patients lack the skin donor sites necessary to achieve definite burn wound coverage by autografting. As conventional meshing procedures of autograft skin only can provide 4:1 (Tanner/ Brennan mesher) up to 9:1 (modified Meek technique) expansion of the skin graft definite coverage of excised burn wound remains problematic. The approach using cultured epidermal autograft (CEA) sheets (Epicel™ - Genzyme Tissue Repair Corporation) with or without an additional dermal layer (Integra™ - Integra Life Sciences/ Johnson&Johnson, Alloderm™ -Life Cell Corporation) is promising. However the excised wound requires additional temporary cover for about 3 weeks until the keratinocytes harvested at admission are grown to large enough sheet grafts to obtain full coverage of the wounds. Currently, the inferior long term durability and the increased fragility of CEA leads to a significant amount of graft failure and an increased need for re-grafting procedures A new product (FDA approval for chronic venous ulcer wound) Apligraf™ - Organogenesis/Novartis was introduced to avoid the waiting period until CEA are available. It is a “shelf product” manufactured from human male foreskin tissue consisting of an epidermal keratinocyte layer and a dermal layer of fibroblasts in a bovine collagen matrix. It can be applied immediately and is gradually replaced by the ingrowth of autologous skin cells. At current time it has been used in chronic venous ulcers and partial thickness wounds. As for temporary coverage all new technologies have to compare to the gold standard of homograft or xenograft (pig skin) coverage. TransCyte™ - Smith&Nephew, and Dermagraft® are other bioengineered “shelf products” consisting of human neonatal foreskin fibroblasts which are integrated in a synthetic epidermal layer (siliconepolymer). It can be applied immediately after excision but requires removal and second stage autografting for definite wound coverage Its use in partial thickness burns is promising, but in our view other more cost-effective dressing materials, which yield basically the same results (Biobrane™ - Bertek, Hydrocolloids as Duoderm™ - Convatec, or occlusive dressing as Opsite™) should be preferred. The major issues to be addressed in the future of tissue-engineered skin are delay in definite permanent coverage, the improvement of long term results regarding durability, fragility of the epidermal surface, and scar formation, as well as the enormous financial costs. In conjunction with gene therapy, it may become possible to differentially stimulate autologous cells in tissue engineered skin constructs and eventually achieve a permanent esthetically and functionally optimal restoration of skin integrity
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Trends in Burn Reconstruction-Our Experience With Early Reconstruction
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2006-01) N. Nugent,; S.P. Fagan,; T. Huang,; D.N. Herndon
    Aim: Historically, burn reconstruction has taken place after maturation of the burn scar. Usually this means delay until two years post burn injury. However, the recent trend is to commence reconstructive surgery early (within two years of burn injury), once stable wound coverage has been achieved. We present our experience with early burn reconstruction, and the operative methods we use. Materials and Methods: From 2002 to 2004, 828 patients underwent a total of 3045 burn reconstructive procedures at our institute. 68.3% of these patients were within one year of burn injury. 47.5% of procedures consisted of head and neck surgeries, 36.1% were hand reconstructive procedures, and the remainder were divided between trunk, lower extremities, perineum and genitalia. We used a variety of techniques including skin grafting, local flaps and tissue expansion. Discussion: Traditionally, the burn scar was left to mature fully before consideration for operative reconstruction was undertaken. However, early surgical intervention to release contractures and reconstruct deformities is increasingly becoming accepted. Advantages of early reconstruction include earlier recovery of function/range of movement and earlier reconstruction of cosmetically distressing deformities. Disadvantages of early surgical intervention include operating on scars that are not fully mature, which can be technically more demanding, and postoperatively more detailed wound care may be required. Conclusion: Early burn reconstruction can provide good functional and cosmetic outcomes. Although, it may be technically more demanding due to the immature wound, and require detailed wound care, earlier functional recovery and aesthetic improvement can be provided to the burn patient.