Browsing by Author "Gonen, Murat"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Transpaeritoneal Laparoscopic Simple Nephrectomy: A Single Center Experience(2014) Cicek, Tufan; Sen, Erhan; Gonen, Murat; Gonulalan, Umut; Kosan, Murat; Ozturk, Bulent; 0000-0003-1944-1722; AAJ-8576-2021; AAA-7140-2021Purpose: In this study, we planned to evaluate the efficacy and perioperative outcomes of transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy at Baskent University Konya Application and Research Center. Material and Methods: The demographic and perioperative data of patients who underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy at Baskent University Konya Application and Research Center Urology clinic between February 2005 and November 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. Operative time, perioperative laboratory results, the durations of hozpitalization and follow-up, perioperative complications and demographic characteristics of each patient were recorded. Results: Overall, 58 patients were included. 27 patients were male (46%) and 31 patients were female (54%). The mean age was 45.3 +/- 17.12 (6-79). The mean operative time was 104.4 +/- 36.5 (40-185) minutes. The mean hospitalization duration was 2.7 +/- 0.7 (2-5) days. The mean preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin levels were 13.7 +/- 1.74 and 12.4 +/- 1.73 mg/dl, respectively. Postoperative hemoglobin levels were statistically significatly lower than preoperative hemoglobin levels (p<0.001). 4 patients (%6.9) needed blood transfusion. 5 patients had grade I, 4 patients had grade II and 2 patients had grade III complications according to modified Clavien classification system. Conclusion: Transperitoneal laparoscopic simple nephrectomy seems to be a safe and efficacious treatment option as having low complication rates.Item Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Spinal versus General Anesthesia(2014) Gonen, Murat; Basaran, BetulPurpose: Tubeless percutaneous neplarolithotomy (PCNL) with double-J stenting is a good option for large kidney calculi without increasing blood loss. In many centers tubeless PCNL is performed under general anesthesia. In the present study we evaluated the impact of spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing tubeless PCNL. Material and Methods: Between February 2011 and February 2012, forty six patients with kidney calculi were treated with tubeless PCNL. Of these patients 26 were treated under spinal anesthesia (group 1) and remaining 20 were treated under general anesthesia (group 2). Groups were compared according to patient demographics, stone size, access number, operative time, presence of supracostal access, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, and complications. Results: There were not any statistically significant differences between groups in terms of patient demographics, mean stone size, mean access number, operative time, presence of supracostal access, and length of hospital stay. However, the analgesic requirement was significantly less in group 1 (53 +/- 39 mg vs. 111 +/- 46 mg, intravenous tramadol in groups 1 and 2, respectively P < .001). Conclusion: Tubeless PCNL under spinal anesthesia is a good alternative for general anesthesia in adult patients. Spinal anesthesia decreases analgesic requirement in patients that were performed tubeless PCNL compared to general anesthesia.