Browsing by Author "Celik, Ismail"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Cutaneous Melanoma in Turkey: Analysis of 1157 Patients in the Melanoma Turkish Study
(2015) Abali, Huseyin; Celik, Ismail; Karaca, Burcak; Turna, Hande; Saglam, Esra Kaytan; Akman, Tulay; Oztop, Ilhan; Coskun, Hasan Senol; Turhal, Nazim Serdar; Sezer, Ahmet; Nayir, Erdinc; Demir, Gokhan; Budakoglu, Burcin; Issikdogan, Abdurrahman; Engin, Huseyin; Kilickap, Saadettin; Coskun, Ugur; Oyan, Basak; Harputluoglu, Hakan; Er, Ozlem; Kavgaci, Halil; Elkiran, Tamer; 26416068
Purpose: To develop a large Turkish National Melanoma registry in order to define demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with melanoma. Methods: The data was collected from 1635 patients with melanoma through a web-based registry system in 22 centers. Herein we present the results of 1157 patients with cutaneous melanoma. Results: The patient median age was 56.4 years and 646 (55.8%) were males. The commonest subtype was superficial spreading type (357, 30.9%). The commonest primary site was the lower extremities (N=353, 30.5%). The most common Breslow thickness was 1-2 mm (361 patients, 43.5%). Only 104 (12.5%) patients had a thickness <1mm. Among 694 patients with available data, 136 (19.6%) presented with stage 4 disease while the most frequent stage was stage 3, encountered in 393 (56.6% patients). Conclusion: Our melanoma registry is the largest in our country providing a snapshot view of cutaneous melanoma and its care. Our patients presented with more advanced stages and they had worse prognosis compared to SEER database.
Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma Epidemiological Registry in Turkey: A Preliminary Evaluation of Diagnosis and Treatment Approaches
(2021) Karaca, Burcak S.; Sezer, Ahmet; Goksu, Sezgin S.; Cicin, Irfan; Erdem, Dilek; Cubukcu, Erdem; Dane, Faysal; Hacibekiroglu, Ilhan; Oksuzoglu, Berna; Alnigenis, Ebru; Ulay, Esat; Celik, Ismail
Prognostic factors for survival in patients with metastatic malign melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group study
(2019) Urun, Yuksel; Yasar, H. Arzu; Turna, Hande; Esin, Ece; Sedef, A. Murat; Alkan, Ali; Oksuzoglu, Berna; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Sendur, M. A. Nahit; Sezer, Ahmet; Kilickap, Saadettin; Utkan, Gungor; Akman, Tulay; Akbulut, Hakan; Celik, Ismail; Abali, Huseyin; 30400750
Purpose Studies in the last decade show survival improvement with checkpoint blocker therapy in patients with metastatic malign melanoma. Our purpose was to define the efficacy of ipilimumab according to the patient's baseline characteristics including absolute lymphocytes count. Methods We collected the data of 97 patients with advanced malign melanoma treated with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg, q3w) retrospectively. Log-rank test was used to analyze the univariate effects of patient's characteristics (age, gender, metastatic sites, ECOG PS, type of melanoma, lactic dehydrogenase levels, anemia, lymphocytes (L), neutrophils (N), N/L ratio), c-kit and BRAF status. Survival analyses were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the possible factors identified with log-rank test. Results The median age was 58, and 58% were male and 90% of patients had at least one prior systemic therapy. The median survival was 9.7 months for all patients; and the 12- and 24-month survival rates were 43% and 19%, respectively. Absolute lymphocytes count, lactic dehydrogenase level, bone metastasis, the number of metastatic sites, and RECIST response were significantly related to survival. After Cox regression analysis, RECIST response (complete or partial response), absolute lymphocytes count (more than 1500/mm(3)) and the number of metastatic sites (less than three sites) remained as significant independent prognostic factors for longer survival. Conclusion Ipilimumab improved survival of patients with metastatic malign melanoma. However, patients with fewer metastatic sites and higher absolute lymphocytes count have a significantly better benefit. To determine if these markers could be used to direct patient therapy, further validation analysis is needed.
Prognostic factors for survival in patients with mucosal and ocular melanoma treated with ipilimumab: Turkish Oncology Group study
(2020) Yasar, H. Arzu; Turna, Hande; Esin, Ece; Sedef, A. Murat; Alkan, Ali; Oksuzoglu, Berna; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Sendur, M. A. Nahit; Sezer, Ahmet; Kilickap, Saadettin; Utkan, Gungor; Akbulut, Hakan; Celik, Ismail; Abali, Huseyin; Urun, Yuksel; 0000-0002-6445-1439; 30924738; AAD-2667-2020
Objective To evaluate prognostic factors associated with the use of ipilimumab in patients with mucosal and uveal melanoma. Methods In this multicenter, retrospective study, 31 patients with uveal and mucosal melanoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2017 were enrolled. Patients' characteristics, metastatic disease sites, treatment before ipilimumab therapy, performance status, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase levels, B-RAF and c-kit mutation status, toxicity, and survival data were assessed for patients with mucosal and uveal melanoma. SPSS version 17 was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. The log-rank test was used for univariate analyses. The Cox regression analysis was used to test the association between multivariate variables and survival. The p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Twenty patients had uveal and eleven patients had mucosal melanoma. The median overall survival was seven months (95% confidence interval: 1.1-12.7). In univariate analysis, while bone metastasis, anemia, high lactate dehydrogenase level, and more metastatic sites were associated with lower overall survival, better treatment response and administration of ipilimumab in first or second lines were associated with favorable overall survival. In multivariate analysis, only treatment response status and administration of ipilimumab in first or second lines were found to be significant as independent prognostic factors for survival. Conclusion Ipilimumab therapy may be associated with increased survival, but this retrospective small N study makes that hard to definitely conclude.