Browsing by Author "Celik, Cetin"

Now showing 1 - 4 of 4

Can risk groups accurately predict non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in sentinel lymph node-positive endometrial cancer patients? A Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (TRSGO-SLN-004)
(2020) Altin, Duygu; Taskin, Salih; Tokgozoglu, Nedim; Vatansever, Dogan; Guler, Adbul H.; Gungor, Mete; Tasci, Tolga; Turan, Hasan; Kahramanoglu, Ilker; Yalcin, Ibrahim; Celik, Cetin; Kose, Faruk; Ortac, Firat; Arvas, Macit; Ayhan, Ali; Taskiran, Cagatay; 33259650
Background and Objectives The purpose of this study was to find out the risk factors associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis and determine the incidence of non-sentinel lymph node metastasis according to risk groups in sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive endometrial cancer patients. Methods Patients who underwent at least bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy after SLN mapping were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into low, intermediate, high-intermediate, and high-risk groups defined by ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO. Results Out of 395 eligible patients, 42 patients had SLN metastasis and 16 (38.1%) of them also had non-SLN metastasis. Size of SLN metastasis was the only factor associated with non-SLN metastasis (p = .012) as 13/22 patients with macrometastasis, 2/10 with micrometastasis and 1/10 with isolated tumor cells (ITCs) had non-SLN metastasis. Although all 4 metastases (1.8%) among the low-risk group were limited to SLNs, the non-SLN involvement rate in the high-risk group was 42.9% and all of these were seen in patients with macrometastatic SLNs. Conclusions Non-SLN metastasis was more frequent in higher-risk groups and the risk of non-SLN metastasis increased with the size of SLN metastasis. Proceeding to complete lymphadenectomy when SLN is metastatic should further be studied as the effect of leaving metastatic non-SLNs in-situ is not known.
Deep Cervical Injection: A Novel Technique to Increase Bilateral Sentinel Lymph Node Detection Rate in Endometrial Cancer Patients with Indocyanine Green (Trsgosln-008)
(2022) Vatansever, Dogan; Altin, Duygu; Giray, Burak; Taskin, Salih; Donmez, Emin; Tokgozoglu, Nedim; Guler, Abdul Hamid; Tasci, Tolga; Bese, Tugan; Turan, Hasan; Kahramanoglu, Ilker; Yalcin, Ibrahim; Celik, Cetin; Demirkiran, Fuat; Gungor, Mete; Ortac, Firat; Kose, Faruk; Arvas, Macit; Ayhan, Ali; Taskiran, Cagatay; 0000-0003-1902-8014; HIR-3028-2022
Diagnostic accuracy of sentinel node biopsy in non-endometrioid, high-grade and/or deep myoinvasive endometrial cancer: A Turkish gynecologic oncology group study (TRSGO-SLN-006)
(2022) Altin, Duygu; Taskin, Salih; Ortac, Firat; Tokgozoglu, Nedim; Vatansever, Dogan; Guler, Abdul Hamid; Gungor, Mete; Tasci, Tolga; Bese, Tugan; Turan, Hasan; Kahramanoglu, Ilker; Yalcin, Ibrahim; Celik, Cetin; Demirkiran, Fuat; Kose, Faruk; Arvas, Macit; Ayhan, Ali; Taskiran, Cagatay; 35033380
Introduction. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping algorithm in high-risk endometrial cancer patients. Methods. Two hundred forty-four patients with non-endometrioid histology, grade 3 endometrioid tumors and/or tumors with deep myometrial invasion were enrolled in this retrospective, multicentric study. After removal of SLNs, all patients underwent pelvic +/- paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Operations were performed via laparotomy, laparoscopy or robotic surgery. Indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue (MB) were used as tracers. SLN detection rate, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and false-negative rate (FNR) were calculated. Results. Surgeries were performed via laparotomy in 132 (54.1%) patients and 152 (62.3%) underwent both bilateral pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy. At least 1 SLN was detected in 222 (91%) patients. Fifty-five (225%) patients had lymphatic metastasis and 45 patients had at least 1 metastatic SLN. Lymphatic metastases were detected by side-specific lymphadenectomy in 8 patients and 2 patients had isolated paraaortic metastasis. Overall sensitivity, NPV and FNR of SLN biopsy were 81.8%, 95% and 182%, respectively. By applying SLN algorithm steps, sensitivity and NPV improved to 96.4% and 98.9%, respectively. For grade 3 tumors, sensitivity, NPV and FNR of the SLN algorithm were 97.1%, 98.9% and 2.9%. Conclusion. SLN algorithm had high diagnostic accuracy in high-risk endometrial cancer. All pelvic metastases were detected by the SLN algorithm and the isolated paraaortic metastasis rate was ignorable. But long-term survival studies are necessary before this approach becomes standard of care. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma in a Turkish province: a retrospective multi-centre study in a low income setting
(2022) Tasdemir, Umit; Ceran, Mehmet Ufuk; Dirican, Aylin Onder; Akar, Serra; Celik, Cetin; Energin, Hasan; Gorkemli, Huseyin; Mammadova, Narmin; Colak, Eser; Ayhan, Ali; 0000-0003-1923-2373; 0000-0002-8184-7531; 35253591
The aim of the current study was to estimate the incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma (LMS) in patients who underwent surgery due to leiomyomas in Konya province, and to contribute to the literature discussing comparisons with similar studies. The digital archives of eight high-volume hospitals were studied for surgeries performed due to leiomyomas between January 2012 and January 2019, and leiomyosarcoma incidence was calculated based on the data obtained. Twenty-one patients in 3703 cases were found to have unexpected leiomyosarcoma, which means we can expect one leiomyosarcoma in 176 (0.56%) surgeries. Six more malignant tumours were detected among the remaining cases. Thus, our study estimated the incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma as 1/176 (0.56%), which is higher than most of the studies in the literature justifying the debate started by the FDA in 2014. As the tumour biology is not yet clear, and the incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma tends to be so high, the key focus must be to try to detect uterine leiomyosarcomas preoperatively for robust patient care.IMPACT STATEMENT What is already known on this subject? The incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma varies widely from 1/498 to 1/8300 depending on the study method and the type of procedure, and there is still controversy, even after the FDA statement that led to a major restriction in laparoscopic surgeries due to concerns about inadvertent morcellation of leiomyosarcomas. What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, the current study found the highest incidence of unexpected leiomyosarcoma, and consequently a serious evaluation of all patients undergoing surgery due to leiomyomas preoperatively considering a leiomyosarcoma candidate is recommended. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Studies on tumour biology and novel markers must be supported for accurate preoperative diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma.