Browsing by Author "Bolukbasi, Yasemin"

Now showing 1 - 17 of 17

Comparison of Involved Field Radiotherapy versus Elective Nodal Irradiation in Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Study
(2020) Topkan, Erkan; Ozdemir, Yurday; Guler, Ozan Cem; Kucuk, Ahmet; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Sezen, Duygu; Akdemir, Eyub Yasar; Sezer, Ahmet; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Pehlivan, Berrin; Selek, Ugur; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 0000-0002-6445-1439; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 32952557; M-9530-2014; AAC-5654-2020; AAG-5629-2021; AAD-2667-2020; AAG-2213-2021; AAD-6910-2021
Background. We retrospectively compared the incidence of isolated elective nodal failure (IENF) and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after elective nodal irradiation (ENI) versus involved-field RT (IFRT) by employing the propensity score matching (PSM) methodology in stage IIIB/C inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).Methods. Our PSM examination included 1048 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients treated with C-CRT from January 2007 to December 2016: a total dose of 66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and 1-3 cycles of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy concurrently. The primary and secondary endpoints were the IENF and toxicity rates and survival outcomes after ENI versus IFRT, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for each group to adjust for confounding variables and facilitate well-balanced comparability by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups.Results. The median follow-up was 26.4 months for the whole study accomplice. The PSM analysis unveiled 1 : 1 matched 646 patients for the ENI (N = 323) and IFRT (N = 323) cohorts. Intergroup comparisons discovered that the 5-year isolated ENF incidence rates (3.4% versus 4.3%;P=0.52) and median overall survival (25.2 versus 24.6 months;P=0.69), locoregional progression-free survival (15.3 versus 15.1 months;P=0.52), and progression-free survival (11.7 versus 11.2 months;P=0.57) durations were similar between the ENI and IFRT cohorts, separately. However, acute grade 3-4 leukopenia (P=0.0012), grade 3 nausea-vomiting (P=0.006), esophagitis (P=0.003), pneumonitis (P=0.002), late grade 3-4 esophageal toxicity (P=0.038), and the need for hospitalization (P<0.001) were all significantly higher in the ENI than in the IFRT group, respectively.Conclusion. Results of the present large-scale PSM cohort established the absence of meaningful IENF or survival differences between the IFRT and ENI cohorts and, consequently, counseled the IFRT as the elected RT technique for such patients since ENI increased the toxicity rates.
Hybrid Arc Could Combine the Benefits of IMRT and VMAT to Deliver a Fast, Conformal, Homogeneous Treatment in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer without Limitations of Low Dose Bath: A Planning Study
(2017) Topkan, Erkan; Saglam, Yüce; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Alpan, Vildan; Kirsner, Steve; Ballo, Matthew; Chang, Joe Y.; Bingolbali, Ayhan; Selek, Ugur; 0000-0001-8120-7123; AAG-2213-2021
Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT, step and shoot) is emerging as the standard of care in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient treatments. Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) delivered with two arcs offers fast and homogeneous dose delivery with known limitations of increased volumes of low dose. The aim of this study is to define whether Hybrid volumetric arc IMRT (HA-IMRT: IMRT and VMAT combination) offers a superior dose distribution over IMRT without the limitations found in VMAT delivery alone. Ten (previously 4DCT planned) locally advanced NSCLC patients treated by IMRT to 70 Gy in 35 fractions were retrospectively re-planned using the HA-IMRT technique. Respiratory correlated imaging (3 mm slice thickness) were generated utilizing the Philips Large Bore 16 slice CT Scanner (Phillips, Inc.). Treatment planning was performed using The Philips Pinnacle Treatment Planning System v. 9.0 (Philips Medical, Cleveland, OH). The PTV was defined as the Integrated Tumor Volume (ITV=internal GTV contoured on all respiratory data sets plus 8 mm margin for all histologies) with a 4 mm margin added. Lung parenchyme was defined and contoured using the 50% phase. Conventional IMRT plans used 6:8 non coplanar or coplanar fields and VMAT plans were generated using two 180 degrees arcs. HA-IMRT plans were generated using a combination of 60% conventional IMRT with 40% VMAT. The maximum dose (Gy) to the spinal cord, V5, V10, V20 for total lung, V20 and V30 for the ipsilateral lung, V30 for heart, V50 and V70 for esophagus, and the V77 for the Clinical Treat Volume (CTV) were compared for all techniques utilizing the Dose Volume Histograms. In addition, total monitor units (MU), total treatment time (I I) and the conformality index (CI) were compared.. Conventional IMRT delivers less low dose to the lung compared to VMAT alone. (V5 VMAT (V5: 55.0% vs 63.0%, p=0.005; V10: 41.4% vs 43.9%, p=0.018). However, VMAT is superior in total lung V20 (V20:30.6% vs 29.3% p=0.010), ipsilateral lung doses (V20:55.5% vs 52.8% p=0.008; V30: 46.1% vs 42.9% p= 0.012), and in heart sparing. (V30: 21.09% vs 17.78% p=0.015; MHD: 15.92% vs 14.81% p=0.021). It is also superior in conformality (CI 1.51 vs 1.26 p=0.005) and treatment delivery is faster ( 293 min vs 108 min p=0.005) with lower MUs (24805 vs 19141 p=0.005). HA-IMRT was found to be superior to VMAT in terms of total lung low dose volumes (V5:58.1% vs 63.0%, p=0.005; V10:42.2% vs 44.9%, p=0.027), superior to IMRT for ipsilateral lung doses (V20: 53.6% vs 55.5%, p=0.007; V30: 43.4% vs 46.1%, p=0.018), and superior in treatment time (199 min vs 293 min, p=0.005) with lower MU's (22155 vs 24805, p=.005). Overall, HA-IMRT provides a more homogenous dose distribution (CTV: V77: 0.55% vs 2.1% vs 1.7%, p=0.000) compared to IMRT and VMAT alone. All three plans provided comparable esophagus and spinal cord Organ at Risk (OAR) doses. HA-IMRT seems to combine the benefits of both conventional IMRT and VMAT; such as to deliver a faster, more conformal, homogeneous treatment in comparison to ssIMRT, and to deliver lower dose to lung in comparison to VMAT.
Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy (HFRT) of Breast/Chest Wall and Regional Nodes in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Toxicity Profile and Survival Outcomes in Retrospective Mono-Institutional Study: In Regard to De Matteis et al
(2022) Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Oymak, Ezgi; Sezen, Duygu; Onal, Cem; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 34815173; D-5195-2014
In Regard to Boeri et al. 'Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Treated with Metastases-Directed Therapy or Standard of Care: A Single-Center Experience'
(2023) Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Oymak, Ezgi; Durankus, Nilufer Kilic; Onal, Cem; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2742-9021; 35027691; HOC-5611-2023
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy versus 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy Strategies for Locally Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer
(2014) Selek, Ugur; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Welsh, James W.; Topkan, Erkan; 25667781
Chemoradiotherapy is the current standard of care in patients with advanced inoperable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Three-dimensional radiotherapy (3DCRT) has been a trusted method for a long time and has well-known drawbacks, most of which could be improved by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). IMRT is not currently the standard treatment of locally advanced NSCLC, but almost all patients could benefit to a degree in organ at risk sparing, dose coverage conformality, or dose escalation. The most critical step for a radiation oncology department is to strictly evaluate its own technical and physical capabilities to determine the ability of IMRT to deliver an optimal treatment plan. This includes calculating the internal tumor motion (ideally 4DCT or equivalent techniques), treatment planning software with an up-to-date heterogeneity correction algorithm, and daily image guidance. It is crucial to optimise and individualise the therapeutic ratio for each patient during the decision of 3DCRT versus IMRT. The current literature rationalises the increasing use of IMRT, including 4D imaging plus PET/CT, and encourages the applicable knowledge-based and individualised dose escalation using advanced daily image-guided radiotherapy.
Low Advanced Lung Cancer Inflammation Index Predicts Poor Prognosis in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
(2020) Topkan, Erkan; Ozdemir, Yurday; Kucuk, Ahmet; Guler, Ozan Cem; Sezer, Ahmet; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Senyurek, Sukran; Kilic Durankus, Nulifer; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Selek, Ugur; Pehlivan, Berrin; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 0000-0002-6445-1439; 0000-0002-5361-364X; 33082783; AAG-2213-2021; AAD-6910-2021; AAG-5629-2021; AAC-5654-2020; M-9530-2014; AAD-2667-2020
Purpose. We aimed to retrospectively investigate the prognostic worth of pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT).Patients and Methods. A total of 164 LA-NPC patients treated with cisplatinum-based definitive C-CRT were included in this retrospective cohort analysis. The convenience of ideal pre-C-CRT ALI cut-offs affecting survival results was searched by employing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. The primary endpoint was the link between the ALI groups and overall survival (OS), while cancer-specific survival (CSS), locoregional progression-free survival [LR(PFS)], distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and PFS comprised the secondary endpoints.Results. The ROC curve analyses distinguished a rounded ALI cut-off score of 24.2 that arranged the patients into two cohorts [ALI >= 24.2 (N = 94) versus < 24.2 (N = 70)] with significantly distinct CSS, OS, DMFS, and PFS outcomes, except for the LRPFS. At a median follow-up time of 79.2 months (range: 6-141), the comparative analyses showed that ALI < 24.2 cohort had significantly shorter median CSS, OS, DMFS, and PFS time than the ALI >= 24.2 cohort (P<0.001for each), which retained significance at 5- (P<0.001) and 10-year (P<0.001) time points. In multivariate analyses, ALI < 24.2 was asserted to be an independent predictor of the worse prognosis for each endpoint (P<0.001for each) in addition to the tumor stage (T-stage) (P<0.05for all endpoints) and nodal stage (N-stage) (P<0.05for all endpoints).Conclusion. As a novel prognostic index, the pretreatment ALI < 24.2 appeared to be strongly associated with significantly diminished survival outcomes in LA-NPC patients treated with C-CRT independent of the universally recognized T- and N-stages.
Low Systemic Inflammation Response Index Predicts Good Prognosis in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients Treated with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
(2020) Topkan, Erkan; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Kucuk, Ahmet; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Sezer, Ahmet; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Selek, Ugur; Pehlivan, Berrin; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 0000-0002-6445-1439; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 0000-0001-8120-7123; AAD-6910-2021; AAD-2667-2020; M-9530-2014; AAG-2213-2021
Background. We investigated the prognostic significance of pretreatment systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Methods. Present retrospective cohort analysis investigated consecutive 154 LAPC patients who received radical CRT. The SIRI was defined as:SIRI=neutrophilxmonocyte/lymphocyte counts. Ideal SIRI cutoff(s) influencing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) results were sought by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The primary endpoint was the interaction between the SIRI and OS results. Results. The median follow-up, PFS, and OS durations were 14.3 (range: 2.9-74.6), 7.9 [%95 confidence interval (CI): 5.7-10.1), and 14.7 months (%95 CI: 11.4-18.0) for the entire cohort, respectively. ROC curve analyses determined the ideal SIRI cutoff that exhibiting a significant link with OS and PFS outcomes at the rounded 1.6 point (AUC: 74.3%; sensitivity: 73.8%; specificity: 70.1%).The SIRI <1.6 patients (N=58) had significantly superior median PFS (13.8 versus 6.7 months; P<0.001) and OS (28.6 versus 12.6 months; P<0.001) lengths than SIRI >= 1.6 patients (N=96), respectively. Although the N0 (versus N1; P<0.05) and CA 19-9 <= 90 U/mL (versus >90 U/mL) appeared as the other significant associates of better OS and PFS in univariate analyses, yet the results of multivariate analyses confirmed the SIRI <1.6 as the independent indicator of superior OS and PFS (P<0.001 for each). Conclusion. Pretreatment SIRI is a novel independent prognosticator that may further enhance the conventional tumor-node-metastases staging system in a more precise prediction of the OS and PFS outcomes of LAPC patients after radical CRT.
Multi-institutional validation of the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO consensus conference risk grouping in Turkish endometrial cancer patients treated with comprehensive surgical staging
(2020) Gultekin, Melis; Guler, Ozan Cem; Sari, Sezin Yuce; Yildirim, Berna Akkus; Onal, Cem; Celik, Husnu; Yuce, Kunter; Ayhan, Ali; Arik, Zafer; Kose, Fatih; Altundag, Ozden; Mustafayev, Teuta Zoto; Atalar, Banu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Yildiz, Ferah; 0000-0001-6908-3412; 0000-0002-2742-9021; 0000-0002-0156-5973; 0000-0003-0197-6622; 0000-0001-6661-4185; 32347768; AAC-5654-2020; D-5195-2014; G-4827-2016; W-9219-2019; AAJ-5802-2021
In this study, 683 patients with endometrial cancer (EC) after comprehensive surgical staging were classified into four risk groups as low (LR), intermediate (IR), high-intermediate (HIR) and high-risk (HR), according to the recent consensus risk grouping. Patients with disease confined to the uterus, >= 50% myometrial invasion (MI) and/or grade 3 histology were treated with vaginal brachytherapy (VBT). Patients with stage II disease, positive/close surgical margins or extra-uterine extension were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT)+/- VBT. The median follow-up was 56 months. The overall survival (OS) was significantly different between LR and HR groups, and there was a trend between LR and HIR groups. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was significantly different between LR and HIR, LR and HR and IR and HR groups. There was no significant difference in OS and RFS rates between the HIR and HR groups. In HR patients, the OS and RFS rates were significantly higher in stage IB - grade 3 and stage II compared to stage III and non-endometrioid histology without any difference between the two uterine-confined stages and between stage III and non-endometrioid histology. The current risk grouping does not clearly discriminate the HIR and IR groups. In patients with comprehensive surgical staging, a further risk grouping is needed to distinguish the real HR group.Impact statement What is already known on this subject? The standard treatment for endometrial cancer (EC) is surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) and/or chemotherapy is recommended according to risk factors. The recent European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) and European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) guideline have introduced a new risk group. However, the risk grouping is still quite heterogeneous. What do the results of this study add? This study demonstrated that the current risk grouping recommended by ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO does not clearly discriminate the intermediate risk (IR) and high-intermediate risk (HIR) groups. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Based on the results of this study, a new risk grouping can be made to discriminate HIR and IR groups clearly in patients with comprehensive surgical staging.
Neoadjuvant Prostate SBRT Followed by Prostatectomy
(2022) Onal, Cem; Sezen, Duygu; Oymak, Ezgi; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; 0000-0002-2742-9021; D-5195-2014
Postchemoradiotherapy Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Distant Metastasis and Survival Results in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancers
(2022) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Haksoyler, Veysel; Kucuk, Ahmet; Durankus, Nulifer Kilic; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Pehlivan, Berrin; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-7123; 35685603; AAG-2213-2021
Background and Objectives. In the absence of similar research, we endeavored to investigate the prognostic usefulness of posttreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPAC). Materials and Methods. Our retrospective research included a sum of 126 LAPAC patients who received CCRT. The NLR was calculated for each patient based on the complete blood count test results obtained on the last day of the CCRT. The availability of optimal cutoff(s) that might dichotomize the whole cohort into two groups with significantly different clinical outcomes was searched using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Primary and secondary endpoints were the potential association between the post-CCRT NLR measures and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes. Results. The median follow-up duration was 14.7 months (range: 2.4-94.5). The median and 3-year OS and DMFS rates for the whole group were 15.3 months (95% confidence interval: 12.4-18.2) and 14.5%, and 8.7 months (95% CI: 6.7-10.7) and 6.3% separately. The ROC curve analysis findings separated the patients into two groups on a rounded NLR cutoff of 3.1 (area under the curve (AUC): 75.4%; sensitivity: 74.2%; specificity: 73.9%) for OS and DMFS: NLR < 3.1 (N = 62) and NLR >= 3.1 (N = 64), respectively. Comparisons between the NLR groups displayed that the median OS (11.4 vs. 21.4 months; P < 0.001) and DMFS (6.0 vs. 16.0 months; P < 0.001) lengths were significantly shorter in the NLR >= 3.1 group than its NLR < 3.1 counterparts, as well as the 3-year actuarial DM rate (79.7% vs. 50.0%; P=0.003). The N1-2 nodal stage, CA 19-9 > 90 U/mL, and NLR > 3.1 were found to be independent predictors of poor prognosis in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion. The present study found that the posttreatment NLR >= 3.1 was independently linked with a higher risk of DM and subsequent degraded survival outcomes in unresectable LAPAC patients managed with exclusive CCRT.
Prechemoradiotherapy Systemic Inflammation Response Index Stratifies Stage IIIB/C Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients into Three Prognostic Groups: A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis
(2021) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Kucuk, Ahmet; Haksoyler, Veysel; Ozdemir, Yurday; Sezen, Duygu; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Ozyilkan, Ozgur; Pehlivan, Berrin; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 33552158; AAG-2213-2021; AAG-5629-2021; AAD-6910-2021
Purpose. We explored the prognostic influence of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) on the survival outcomes of stage IIIB/C non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Methods. Present propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis comprised 876 stage IIIB/C NSCLC patients who received 1-3 cycles of platinum-based doublets concurrent with thoracic radiotherapy from 2007 to 2017. The primary and secondary objectives were the relationships between the SIRI values and overall (OS) and progression-free survival, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated for SIRI groups to adjust for confounders and to facilitate well-balanced comparability between the SIRI groups by creating 1 : 1 matched study groups. Results. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an optimal SIRI cutoff at 1.9 for OS (AUC: 78.8%; sensitivity: 73.7%; specificity: 70.7%) and PFS (AUC: 80.5%; sensitivity: 75.8%; specificity: 72.9%) and we grouped the patients into two PSM cohorts: SIRI < 1.9 (N = 304) and SIRI >= 1.9 (N = 304), respectively. The SIRI >= 1.9 cohort had significantly worse median OS (P<0.001) and PFS (P<0.001) than their SIRI < 1.9 companions. The further combination of SIRI with disease stage exhibited that the SIRI-1 (IIIB and SIRI < 1.9) and SIRI-3 (IIIC and SIRI >= 1.9) cohorts had the best and worst outcomes, respectively, with SIRI-2 cohort (IIIB and SIRI >= 1.9 or IIIC and SIRI < 1.9) being remained in between (P<0.001 for OS and PFS, separately). In multivariate analysis, the two- and three-laddered stratifications per the 1.9 cutoffs and SIRI groups retained their independent significance, individually. Conclusions. The SIRI >= 1.9 independently prognosticated significantly worse OS and PFS results and plated the stage IIIB/C patients into three fundamentally distinct prognostic groups.
The Prognostic Significance of Novel Pancreas Cancer Prognostic Index in Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreas Cancers Treated with Definitive Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy
(2021) Topkan, Erkan; Selek, Ugur; Pehlivan, Berrin; Kucuk, Ahmet; Haksoyler, Veysel; Durankus, Nulifer Kilic; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; 0000-0001-8087-3140; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-4505-2280; 34511977; O-5474-2014; AAG-2213-2021
Purpose: We evaluated the prognostic quality of the novel pancreas cancer prognostic index (PCPI), a combination of CA 19-9 and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), on the outcomes of locally advanced pancreas adenocarcinoma (LAPAC) patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Methods: This retrospective analysis covered 152 unresectable LAPAC patients treated from 2007 to 2019. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define ideal cutoff thresholds for the pretreatment CA 19-9 and SIRI measurements, indivi-dually. The associations between the PCPI groups and progression -free-(PFS) and overall survival (OS) comprised the respective primary and secondary endpoints. Results: The ROC curve analysis distinguished the respective rounded optimal cutoffs at 91 U/m/ L (< versus >= 90) and 1.8 (< versus >= 1.8) for CA 19-9 and SIRI, arranging the study cohort into two significantly different survival groups for each, with resultant four likely groups: Group-1: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L and SIRI<1.8, Group-2: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L but SIRI >= 1.8, Group-3: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/ m/L but SIRI<1.8, and Group-4: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L and SIRI >= 1.8. Since the PFS (P=0.79) and OS (P=0.86) estimates of the groups 2 and 3 were statistically indistinct, we merged them as one group and created the novel three-tiered PCPI: PCPI-1: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L and SIRI<1.8, PCPI-2: CA 19-9<90 U/m/L but SIRI >= 1.8 or CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L but SIRI<1.8, and PCPI-3: CA 19-9 >= 90 U/m/L and SIRI >= 1.8, respectively. Comparative analyses unveiled that the PCPI-1 and PCPI-3 groups had the respective best and worst PFS (17.0 versus 7.5 versus 4.4 months; P<0.001) and OS (26.1 versus 15.1 versus 7.4 months; P<0.001) outcomes, while the PCPI-2 group posed in between. The multivariate analysis outcomes confirmed the novel three tired PCPI's independent prognostic significance on either of the PFS [HR: 5.38 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.96-5.80); P<0.001)] and OS [HR: 5.67 (95% CI: 5.19-6.15); P<0.001] endpoints, separately. Conclusion: The new PCPI introduced here can be used as an independent and reliable prog-nostic indicator to divide LAPAC patients into three subgroups with discrete survival results.
Prognostic value of pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score in stage IIIB geriatric non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical chemoradiotherapy
(2019) Topkan, Erkan; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Ozdemir, Yurday; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Selek, Ugur; 31178158
Objectives: To investigate the prognostic significance of pre-treatment Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) in stage 11113 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) older patients treated with radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy (C-CRT). Materials and Methods: We included 83 stage IIIB NSCLC older patients (age > 70 years) treated with C-CRT consisting of 60-66 Gy (2 Gy/fx) thoracic radiotherapy and at least 1 cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were grouped into three: GPS-0: c-reactive protein (CRP) <= 10 mg/L and albumin >35 g/L, GPS-1: CRP <= 10 mg/L and albumin <= 35 g/L or CRP > 10 mg/L and albumin >35 g/L, GPS-2: CRP > 10 mg/L and albumin <= 35 g/L according to the definition. The relationship between GPS groups and overall survival (OS) was the primary objective, while locoregional-(LRPFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were secondary objectives. Results: For the whole cohort, the median OS, LRPFS, and OS were 19.7 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.8-22.6), 13.2 (95% CI: 8.7-17.7), and 83 months (95% CI: 6.6-10.0), respectively. Comparisons between the GPS-0, GPS-1, and GPS-2 groups revealed that the lower GPS was associated with significantly superior median OS (25.8 versus 16.3 versus 9.4 months; p < .001) which retained its independent significance in multivariate analysis (p < .001), as well. Similarly, the respective median LRPFS (20.0 versus 10.4 versus 63 months; p < .001), and PFS (11.3 versus 73 versus 4.1 months; p < .001) durations were also significantly longer in the earlier GPS groups. Discussion: The present results suggested that the GPS was useful in three layered stratification of older stage IIIB NSCLC patients undergoing C-CRT in terms of OS, LRPS, and PFS times. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Reproducible Deep-Inspiration Breath-Hold Irradiation with Forward Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer Significantly Reduces Cardiac Radiation Exposure Compared To Inverse Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy
(2014) Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Saglam, Yucel; Selek, Ugur; Topkan, Erkan; Kataria, Anglina; Unal, Zeynep; Alpan, Vildan; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8120-7123; 24852861; AAG-2213-2021
Aims and background. To investigate the objective utility of our clinical routine of reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold irradiation for left-sided breast cancer patients on reducing cardiac exposure. Methods and study design. Free-breathing and reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold scans were evaluated for our 10 consecutive left-sided breast cancer patients treated with reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold. The study was based on the adjuvant dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction. Both inverse and forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy plans were generated for each computed tomography dataset. Results. Reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold plans with forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy significantly spared the heart and left anterior descending artery compared to generated free-breathing plans based on mean doses free-breathing vs reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold, left ventricle (296.1 vs 94.5 cGy, P = 0.005), right ventricle (158.3 vs 59.2 cGy, P = 0.005), left anterior descending artery (171.1 vs 78.1 cGy, P = 0.005), and whole heart (173.9 vs 66 cGy, P = 0.005), heart V20 (2.2% vs 0%, P = 0.007) and heart V10 (4.2% vs 0.3%, P = 0.007) whereas they revealed no additional burden on the ipsilateral lung. Reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold and free-breathing plans with inverse intensity-modulated radiotherapy provided similar organ at risk sparing by reducing the mean doses to the left ventricle, left anterior descending artery, heart, V10-V20 of the heart and right ventricle. However, forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy showed significant reduction in doses to the left ventricle, left anterior descending artery, heart, right ventricle, and contralateral breast (mean dose, 248.9 to 12.3 cGy, P= 0.005). The mean doses for free-breathing vs reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold of the proximal left anterior descending artery were 1.78 vs 1.08 Gy and of the distal left anterior descending artery were 8.11 vs 3.89 Gy, whereas mean distances to the 50 Gy isodose line of the proximal left anterior descending artery were 6.6 vs 3.3 cm and of the distal left anterior descending artery were 7.4 vs 4.1 cm, with forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Overall reduction in mean doses to proximal and distal left anterior descending artery with deep-inspiration breath-hold irradiation was 39% (P = 0.02) and 52% (P = 0.002), respectively. Conclusions. We found a significant reduction of radiation exposure to the contralateral breast, left and right ventricles, as well as of proximal and especially distal left anterior descending artery with the deep-inspiration breath-hold technique with forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
Systemic Inflammation Response Index Predicts Survival Outcomes in Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients Treated with Standard Stupp Protocol
(2020) Topkan, Erkan; Kucuk, Ahmet; Ozdemir, Yurday; Mertsoylu, Huseyin; Besen, Ali Ayberk; Sezen, Duygu; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Pehlivan, Berrin; Selek, Ugur; 0000-0002-7862-0192; 0000-0001-8120-7123; 0000-0002-2218-2074; 0000-0002-1932-9784; 33274245; AAD-6910-2021; AAG-2213-2021; AAG-5629-2021; M-9530-2014
Objectives. We endeavored to retrospectively assess the prognostic merit of pretreatment systemic immune response index (SIRI) in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients who underwent postoperative partial brain radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent plus adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ), namely, the Stupp protocol. Methods. The records of 181 newly diagnosed GBM patients who received the postoperative Stupp protocol were retrospectively analyzed. The SIRI value for each eligible patient was calculated by utilizing the platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte measures obtained on the first day of treatment: SIRI=NeutrophilsxMonocytes/Lymphocytes. The ideal cutoff values for SIRI connected with the progression-free- (PFS) and overall survival (OS) results were methodically searched through using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Primary and secondary end-points constituted the potential OS and PFS distinctions among the SIRI groups, respectively. Results. The ROC curve analysis labeled the ideal SIRI cutoffs at 1.74 (Area under the curve (AUC): 74.9%; sensitivity: 74.2%; specificity: 71.4%) and 1.78 (AUC: 73.6%; sensitivity: 73.1%; specificity: 70.8%) for PFS and OS status, individually. The SIRI cutoff of 1.78 of the OS status was chosen as the common cutoff for the stratification of the study population (Group 1: SIRI <= 1.78 (N=96) and SIRI>1.78 (N=85)) and further comparative PFS and OS analyses. Comparisons between the two SIRI cohorts manifested that the SIRI <= 1.78 cohort had altogether significantly superior median PFS (16.2 versus 6.6 months; P<0.001) and OS (22.9 versus 12.2 months; P<0.001) than its SIRI>1.78 counterparts. The results of multivariate Cox regression analyses ratified the independent and significant alliance between a low SIRI and longer PFS (P<0.001) and OS (P<0.001) durations, respectively. Conclusions. Present results firmly counseled the pretreatment SIRI as a novel, sound, and independent predictor of survival outcomes in newly diagnosed GBM patients intended to undergo postoperative Stupp protocol.
Untitled Reply
(2023) Onal, Cem; Sezen, Duygu; Oymak, Ezgi; Bolukbasi, Yasemin
Vaginal cuff brachytherapy practice in endometrial cancer patients: a report from the Turkish Oncology Group
(2021) Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Onal, Cem; Ozsaran, Zeynep; Senyurek, Sukran; Akdemir, Eyub Yasar; Selek, Ugur; Yildiz, Ferah; 33897788
Purpose: The American Brachytherapy Association is attempting to develop standards for delivering brachytherapy, although differences in practice have been reported in the literature. This study evaluated vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VBT) practice and quality of life-related recommendations among Turkish radiation oncologists. Material and methods: A nationwide web-based 17-item survey was distributed to the members of the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology. These members received e-mail notifications, and a link was posted on the Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology internet site to solicit voluntary responses The survey addressed the simulation processes, target volume, prescribed dose, delivery schedules, and recommendations related to vaginal side effects. Results: Fifty-seven radiation oncologists responded to the survey. The most used dose fraction schemes for adjuvant VBT were 7 Gy x 3 fractions (30%), 5.5 Gy x 5 fractions (26%), and 6 Gy x 5 fractions (28%). The preferred VBT scheme was 5 Gy x 3 fractions (50%) when the external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) dose was 45 Gy external radiotherapy, while the preferred schemes were 6 Gy x 3 fractions (30%) or 5 Gy x 3 fractions (32%) when the external radiotherapy dose was increased to 50.4 Gy. One-half of the respondents delivered VBT twice a week, and the dose was prescribed to 0.5 cm from vaginal mucosa by 86% of the respondents. There was no common definition for the dose prescription length, which was defined as 3 cm from the vaginal cuff in 33% of responses and as 4 cm in 35% of responses. For serous and clear cell histological types, 38% of the respondents targeted "full cylinder length". To prevent vaginal side effects, 78% of the respondents recommended using a vaginal dilator and/or sexual intercourse after VBT. Conclusions: This survey revealed variations in the clinical practice of VBT among Turkish radiation oncologists, which suggests that standardization is necessary.