Repository logo
Communities & Collections
All of DSpace
  • English
  • العربية
  • বাংলা
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Ελληνικά
  • Español
  • Suomi
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • हिंदी
  • Magyar
  • Italiano
  • Қазақ
  • Latviešu
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Srpski (lat)
  • Српски
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Tiếng Việt
Log In
New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Basiri, Abbas"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Results Per Page
  • Sort Options
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy—An Iranian Model for Developing Countries: A Cost-Effective No-Rush Approach
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2004-12) Simforoosh, Nasser; Basiri, Abbas; Tabibi, Ali; Shakhssalim, Nasser
    Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate donor and graft outcome in kidney transplantations from laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. Materials and Methods: From June 2000 to June 2004, 341 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed. Demographics and hospital records were reviewed. Mean ages of donors and recipients were 27.59 ± 4.80 years (range, 20-56 years) and 35.36 ± 14.85 years (range, 3-75 years). Results: Nephrectomy was left sided in 96.2%. Mean follow-up was 13.32 ± 35.98 months. Mean warm ischemia time was 8.17 minutes (range, 2.5-19 minutes). Mean operative time was 260.34 minutes. Median serum creatinine levels (mg/dL) of the recipients were 1.30, 1.45, and 1.20 at day 7, and at 1 and 12 months. One-year graft survival was 92.7%, 94.6%, and 92.6% in the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy groups with warm ischemia times of less than 6, 6-10, and more than 10 minutes (P = NS). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 2.1% of donors, and reoperation was performed in 3.8% of laparoscopic donor nephrectomies. Blood transfusion was required in 7.1% of donors. Ureteral complications were observed in 2.1% of recipients. Vascular control was performed using medium-large clips instead of endo GIA, and the kidney was extracted via a suprapubic approach using the hand instead of an ENDOCATCH bag; hence, $600 was saved in each nephrectomy. No vascular accident occurred from pedicular vessels. Conclusions: Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy can be performed with a less-expensive setup (to be expanded in developing countries) without jeopardizing results. Because warm ischemic time in our study did not affect graft outcome significantly, there appears to be no need to rush harvesting the kidney to achieve a better quality kidney. Vascular control using nonautomatic clips instead of more costly endo GIA and hand extraction of the kidney is safe, practical, and economical.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Renal Transplant in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2009-03) Basiri, Abbas; Azadvari, Mohaddeseh; Parvaneh, Masoud Javadi; Hosseini-Moghddam, Seyed Mohammadmehdi; Shakhssalim, Nasser
    Objectives: There is no knowledge on the outcome of renal transplant for end-stage renal disease secondary to neurogenic bladder caused by spinal cord injury. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of kidney allograft recipients with spinal cord injury. Materials and Methods: We evaluated graft survival, clinical course, laboratory findings, and imaging studies in 21 men (veterans) with spinal cord injury and renal failure secondary to neurogenic bladder. They underwent renal transplant between 1990 and 2006. Bladder dysfunction was appropriately managed before or with receiving the kidney allograft. Results: Mean (± SD) age of patients was 43.8 ± 5.9 years. Mean glomerular filtration rate at the closing date of the study was 89.5 ± 33.6 mL/min. During follow-up (median: 6 years, range: 1-17 years), mean duration of graft survival was 15.4 ± 1.0 years (95% confidence interval, 13.2-17.5 years). Following renal transplant, mean nadir level of serum creatinine was 74.25 ± 16.79 µmol/L (0.84 ± 0.19 mg/dL). Six patients (28.6%) had kidney stones before renal transplant, and 2 patients (9.5%) after (1 patient with new kidney stones and 1 patient with kidney stones before and after transplant). Pyelonephritis occurred in 18 patients (85.7%) before transplant, and in 9 patients (42.9%) patients after (P = .07). Graft loss occurred in 2 patients (9.5%) 4 and 18 months after the transplant. Conclusions: Spinal cord injury patients who receive allograft kidney transplants have acceptable outcomes, and transplant may reduce urolithiasis and upper urinary tract infection.

| Başkent Üniversitesi | Kütüphane | Açık Bilim Politikası | Açık Erişim Politikası | Rehber |

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback
Repository logo COAR Notify