Browsing by Author "Basaran, Seniha"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Diagnosis, treatment and prevention of infective endocarditis: Turkish consensus report-2019
    (2020) Yavuz, Serap Simsek; Deniz, Denef Berzeg; Azap, Ozlem; Basaran, Seniha; Cag, Yasemin; Cagatay, Atahan; Cinar, Gule; Kaya, Sibel Dogan; Hizmali, Lokman; Isik, Mehmet Emirhan; Kilicaslan, Nirgul; Menekse, Sirin; Meric-Koc, Meliha; Ozturk, Serpil; Sensoy, Ayfer; Tezer-Tekce, Yasemin; Tukenmez-Tigen, Elif; Uygun-Kizmaz, Yesim; Velioglu-Ocalmaz, Mutlu Seyda; Yesilkaya, Aysegul; Yilmaz, Emel; Yilmaz, Neziha; Yilmaz-Karadag, Fatma; 0000-0002-0699-8890; 0000-0002-7635-8848; 0000-0002-3171-8926; 32147661; AAA-8899-2021; AAN-5897-2021; AAF-5652-2021; S-7343-2016; ABA-2413-2020; AAK-4089-2021
    Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but still important as an infectious disease due to high rate of morbidity and substantial mortality. Although IE is not a notifiable disease in Turkey, and an incidence study has not been performed, the incidence may be higher than that in the developed countries due to frequent predisposing cardiac conditions and higher rates of nosocomial bacteremia, which may lead to IE in risk groups. IE generally affects the elderly in developed countries but it is frequently encountered among young individuals in Turkey. In order to reduce mortality and morbidity, it is critical to diagnose IE, to determine the causative agent, and to start treatment rapidly. Most patients cannot be diagnosed at the first visit, about half can be diagnosed after 3 months, and the disease often goes unnoticed. In patients diagnosed with IE, the rate of the identification of a causative organism is significantly lower in Turkey than that in developed countries. Some important microbiological diagnostic tests are not performed in most centers and several antimicrobials that are recommended as the first option for the treatment particularly antistaphylococcal penicillins, are unavailable in Turkey. These problems necessitate reviewing the epidemiological, laboratory, and clinical characteristics of IE in our country, as well as the current information about its diagnosis, treatment, and prevention together with local data. The diagnosis and treatment processes of IE should be standardized at every stage so that the management can be conducted in a setting in which physicians of various specialties are involved and is consistent with the current recommendations. The Study Group for Infective Endocarditis and Other Cardiovascular Infections of the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases called for the collaboration of the relevant specialist organizations to establish a consensus report on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of IE in the context of current information and local data in Turkey.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    The Turkish Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Society (KLIMIK) Evidence-Based Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Brucellosis, 2023
    (2023) Simsek-Yavuz, Serap; Ozger, Selcuk; Benli, Aysun; Ates, Can; Aydin, Mehtap; Aygun, Gokhan; Azap, Alpay; Azap, Ozlem; Basaran, Seniha; Demirturk, Nese; Ergonul, Onder; Kocagul-Celikbas, Aysel; Kuscu, Ferit; Saricaoglu, Elif Mukime; Sayin-Kutlu, Selda; Turker, Nesrin; Turkoglu-Yilmaz, Emine
    Although brucellosis is very common in the world and Turkiye, there are no evidence-based guidelines to guide the diagnosis and treatment of the disease. This guide has been prepared by the Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases to provide evidence-based recommendations to physicians from different specialties interested in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis. The recommendations of the Clinical Practice Guide Development Guide of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) were taken as the basis for preparing this guide. The guideline preparation group determined 20 questions considered to be important in the diagnosis and treatment of brucellosis, and the publications that could answer these questions prepared in PICO (Population/Patient [P], Intervention [I], Comparison [C], Outcome [O]) format, were searched in ULAKBIM Tr Dizin, PubMed, Cochrane databases without date restrictions. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to rank the evidence and determine the strength of the recommendations for each PICO question and for each individual outcome. Meta-analyses of comparative clinical studies were performed to answer the PICO questions. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses with data obtained from case reports and case series were conducted in the absence of comparative clinical studies. It is planned to update the recommendations at regular intervals in line with the results of new studies.