Internal Comparison Standard for Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

dc.contributor.authorKoc, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorErbay, Gurcan
dc.contributor.authorKaradeli, Elif
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-1706-8680en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-0352-8818en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-0987-1980en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID27956463en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAK-5370-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAK-5399-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDS-8384-2016en_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-10T07:55:03Z
dc.date.available2023-08-10T07:55:03Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.description.abstractBackground: Standards for abdominal diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements, and analysis are required for reproducibility. Purpose: To identify optimal internal comparison standards for DWI to normalize the measured ADC for increased accuracy of differentiating malignant and benign abdominal lesions. Material and Methods: We retrospectively studied 97 lesions (89 patients; age, 57 +/- 13 years) with histopathologically confirmed abdominal disease. Seven normal body parts/contents (normal parenchyma, spleen, kidney, gallbladder bile, paraspinal muscle, spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) were assessed as internal references for possible use as comparison standards. Three observers performed ADC measurements. Statistical analyses included interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and coefficient of variation (CV). ROC analyses were performed to assess diagnostic accuracy of lesion ADC and normalized ADC for differentiating lesions. Pathology results were the reference standard. Results: Mean and normalized ADCs were significantly lower for malignant lesions than for benign lesions (P< 0.001). ICC was excellent for all internal references. Gallbladder had the lowest CV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses showed that normalized ADCs obtained using normal parenchyma were better than lesion ADCs for differentiating malignant and benign abdominal lesions (area under the curve [AUC], 0.808 and 0.756, respectively). The normalized ADCs obtained using CSF shows higher accuracy than lesion ADCs (0.80 and 0.76, respectively) for differentiating between malignant and benign abdominal lesions. Conclusion: The normal parenchyma from a lesion-detected organ can be used as an internal comparison standard for DWI. CSF can be used as a generalizable in plane reference standard.en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1600-0455en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1036en_US
dc.identifier.issn0284-1851en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85025068263en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1029en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10221
dc.identifier.volume58en_US
dc.identifier.wos000405779200001en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1177/0284185116681040en_US
dc.relation.journalACTA RADIOLOGICAen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)en_US
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)en_US
dc.subjectinternal referenceen_US
dc.subjectcomparison standarden_US
dc.subjectnormalizationen_US
dc.subjectabdominalen_US
dc.titleInternal Comparison Standard for Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted Imagingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: