Tıp Fakültesi / Faculty of Medicine

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/1403

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Item
    Comparison of the Early Term Complications and Patency Rates of the Standard (Parachute) and Diamond-Shaped End-To-Side Anastomosis Techniques in Arteriovenous Fistulas Created for Hemodialysis
    (2018) Yabanoglu, Hakan; Kus, Murat; Arer, Ilker Murat; Bali, Cagla; Avci, Tevfik; Akdur, Aydincan; Caliskan, Kenan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-3369; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6529-7579; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2615-1918; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-959X; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8726-3369; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8767-5021; 30060787; AAJ-7865-2021; AAJ-7870-2021; AAI-8790-2021; AAF-1698-2021; AAA-3068-2021; AAJ-7201-2021
    Objective: To compare the early-term patency and complication rates of the end-to-side anastomosis techniques parachute and diamond-shaped techniques in arteriovenous fistulas. Study Design: Prospective randomised study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of General Surgery, Adana Baskent University Application and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey, between October 2014 and January 2015. Methodology: Patients with end stage renal disease who underwent arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis were grouped into two according to the anastomosis technique performed. Group 1 was composed of the patients undergoing the standard parachute technique and Group 2 consisted of the patients operated with the diamond-shaped anastomosis technique. The two groups were compared with each other with respect to clinical and demographic data, operative and postoperative variables, and complication and patency rates. Results: A total of 56 patients underwent arteriovenous fistula creation. The overall complication rate was 12.5%. The early-term patency rate was higher in the diamond-shaped anastomosis technique than the standard parachute end-to-side anastomosis technique. Effective dialysis was established after 4 weeks in 48 (85.7%) patients in the overall study group, 23 (82.1%) in Group 1, and 25 (89.2%) in Group 2. However, there was no significant difference between both the techniques with respect to effectiveness of dialysis. Conclusion: Both end-to-side anastomosis techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. Using a patient-specific suitable technique rather than a standard technique would be more appropriate in arteriovenous fistulas formation.