Yabanoglu, HakanKus, MuratArer, Ilker MuratBali, CaglaAvci, TevfikAkdur, AydincanCaliskan, Kenan2023-08-252023-08-2520181022-386Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/10421Objective: To compare the early-term patency and complication rates of the end-to-side anastomosis techniques parachute and diamond-shaped techniques in arteriovenous fistulas. Study Design: Prospective randomised study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of General Surgery, Adana Baskent University Application and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey, between October 2014 and January 2015. Methodology: Patients with end stage renal disease who underwent arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis were grouped into two according to the anastomosis technique performed. Group 1 was composed of the patients undergoing the standard parachute technique and Group 2 consisted of the patients operated with the diamond-shaped anastomosis technique. The two groups were compared with each other with respect to clinical and demographic data, operative and postoperative variables, and complication and patency rates. Results: A total of 56 patients underwent arteriovenous fistula creation. The overall complication rate was 12.5%. The early-term patency rate was higher in the diamond-shaped anastomosis technique than the standard parachute end-to-side anastomosis technique. Effective dialysis was established after 4 weeks in 48 (85.7%) patients in the overall study group, 23 (82.1%) in Group 1, and 25 (89.2%) in Group 2. However, there was no significant difference between both the techniques with respect to effectiveness of dialysis. Conclusion: Both end-to-side anastomosis techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. Using a patient-specific suitable technique rather than a standard technique would be more appropriate in arteriovenous fistulas formation.enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessArteriovenous fistulaPatencyComplicationDiamond-shaped techniquearticle288597602000440362100006