Başkent Üniversitesi Yayınları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11727/13092

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    CTLA4 CT60 A/G Gene Polymorphism in Liver Transplant Recipients
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2010-09) Azarpira, Negar; Daraie, Masumeh; Aghdaie, Mahdokht Hosein; Malekhosseini, Seyed Ali
    Objectives: Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4) has a critical role in the down-regulation of the immune response. We retrospectively examined the association between acute rejection and the single nucleotide polymorphism A/G in the CTLA-4 CT60 gene in liver transplant recipients. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one liver transplant recipients with at least 3 months’ follow-up were selected and genotyped for CTLA-4 CT60 polymorphism (HpyCH4 IV). The association of each genotype with allograft acute rejection was evaluated. Results: The mean age of patients was 27.9 ± 15.17 years (minimum, 1 year, maximum, 55 years), with 39% male and 61% female. Overall, 17 recipients (33.3%) experienced acute rejection within the first 3 months after a liver transplant. In our study, 50% of the patients (n=26) have G/A , 31% (n=16) have A/A, and 17% have G/G genotypes (n=9). Distribution of alleles was not different according to underlying liver disease. There also was no difference in sex, age, and distributions of CTLA-4 CT60 alleles with acute rejection episodes. Conclusions: CT60 A/G dimorphism within the 3'-UTR of CTLA4 gene does not influence acute rejection development in liver transplant. However, organ rejection is determined by a combination of several genetic traits rather than a single gene. Therefore, more studies with larger patient numbers are necessary to investigate the effect of combinations of genetic phenotypes involved in this process.
  • Item
    Liver Transplant: A Primer
    (Başkent Üniversitesi, 2010-06) Movahedi, Zohreh; Saab, Sammy; Holt, Curtis D.
    Liver transplant has been accepted as a successful therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver disease. Patient and graft survival has incrementally increased over the past 2 decades, mainly because of immunosuppressive regimens. However, the nonspecific nature of immunosuppressive agents is associated with an increased risk of development of opportunistic infections, renal impairment, metabolic derangements, neurotoxicity, de novo malignancies, and recurrence of the primary disease. Immunosuppressive regimen pharmacologic classes include calcineurin inhibitors, anti-metabolites, mTOR inhibitors, steroids, and antibody-based therapies. These agents affect T-cell–dependent B-cell activation, and target different sites in the T-cell activation cascade by inhibiting T-cell activation or causing T-cell depletion. The goals of immunosuppression in solid-organ transplant are to prevent allograft rejection as well as optimize allograft function, prolong patient survival, and improve patient quality of life. Therefore, it is essential to carefully select the immunosuppressive regimen that will result in significant improvements in long-term liver transplant patients’ survival and quality of life.