Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIsler, Sila Cagri
dc.contributor.authorUraz, Ahu
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Berceste
dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Yucel
dc.contributor.authorCula, Serpil
dc.contributor.authorCetiner, Deniz
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-10T07:37:59Z
dc.date.available2023-05-10T07:37:59Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8951
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of laser photobiomodulation (PBM) and topical ozone therapy on the reepithelialization of palatal donor site wounds through clinical assessment and computer-aided image analysis and to assess the patient morbidity following free gingival graft (FGG) surgeries. Material and methods: Thirty-six patients requiring FGG were randomly allocated into three groups: laser group (n=12), ozone group (n=12), and control group (n=12). Epithelialization was evaluated by applying 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) to the wound area and also measured by using digital image analysis (ImageJ). Bland-Altman plots were used for assessing agreement between H2O2 and ImageJ measurements. Parameters in relation to patient morbidity were assessed by using visual analog scale (VAS) on the first 3, 7, 14, and 30 days postoperatively. Results: At day 14, statistically significant smaller wounds were observed with digital image analysis in the ozone group as compared with the control group (p=0.034). However, intergroup comparison of the remaining wound area evaluated by the clinician using the H2O2 method did not reveal any significant differences (p>0.05). Nonetheless, according to Bland-Altman analysis, the lower and upper limits showed a moderate agreement between the two measurement methods. The mean VAS sores exhibiting postoperative discomfort was observed to be significantly higher in the control group compared with the laser group (p=0.002) and ozone group (p<0.001) at day 7. Conclusions: Adjunctive ozone therapy could have a significantly beneficial effect on the acceleration of palatal wound healing following FGG procedures. Both PBM and ozone treatment modalities reduced postoperative discomfort as compared with spontaneous healing.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1089/pho.2018.4492en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectozone therapyen_US
dc.subjectreepithelializationen_US
dc.subjectfree gingival grafen_US
dc.subjecttlow-level laser therapyen_US
dc.subjectwound healingen_US
dc.titleEffects of Laser Photobiomodulation and Ozone Therapy on Palatal Epithelial Wound Healing and Patient Morbidityen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalPHOTOMEDICINE AND LASER SURGERYen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage571en_US
dc.identifier.endpage580en_US
dc.identifier.wos000445762100001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85056517394en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID30260741en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-2440-6884en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAU-7742-2021en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAW-6424-2020en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record