Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDurdag, Gulsen Dogan
dc.contributor.authorAlemdaroglu, Songul
dc.contributor.authorBaran, Safak Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorSerbetcioglu, Gonca Coban
dc.contributor.authorOzmete, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorEzer, Ali
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Husnu
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-05T08:39:05Z
dc.date.available2023-01-05T08:39:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2363-8397en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/8553
dc.description.abstractPurpose Laparoscopy has been used in evaluation of ovarian cancer to assess the extent and surgical resectability of the disease, and to avoid futile laparotomy, where primary cytoreduction is not suitable. Aim of this study is to investigate the contribution of laparoscopy in predicting 'no gross residue' in advanced stage ovarian cancer. Methods Data of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients, who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for prediction of complete cytoreduction due to an alternative model, are analyzed retrospectively. Accordingly, in the absence of obvious mesenteric retraction or extensive tumoral implants on small intestine in laparoscopic assessment, cases were deemed surgically resectable, and the operation was continued with laparotomy to achieve complete cytoreduction. Clinical features of the patients, surgical details, complete and optimal cytoreduction rates, and perioperative complications were evaluated. Results Out of 243 patients with advanced stage ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer, laparoscopy was performed at 93 patients, 77 of whom underwent primary cytoreduction subsequently. Complete cytoreduction (no gross residue) and optimal cytoreduction (< 1 cm residual tumor) rates were 75.3 and 100%, respectively. None of the patients had suboptimal surgery. Morbidity and mortality rates were acceptable. Conclusion Laparoscopic evaluation prior to cytoreductive surgery can highly contribute to prediction of complete or optimal cytoreduction in suitable patients. However, experience and skills of the surgeon, as well as technical equipment of the center, may affect surgery; therefore, the model to predict residual tumor should be individualized according to the set up and the surgical team of each center.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s40944-022-00664-7en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComplete cytoreductionen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectNo gross residueen_US
dc.subjectOvarian canceren_US
dc.subjectPredictive index scoreen_US
dc.titleImportance of Laparoscopy in Predicting Complete Cytoreduction at Advanced Stage Ovarian Canceren_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalINDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGYen_US
dc.identifier.volume20en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.wos000876306900003en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85140874967
dc.contributor.orcIDhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-6659en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record