Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCagici, Can A.
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-20T10:36:18Z
dc.date.available2019-06-20T10:36:18Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1949-8470
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i12/933.htm
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/3631
dc.description.abstractThis letter is a commentary on the article titled "Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography", published in the January 2016 issue of World Journal of Radiology. The authors definition of the secondary middle turbinate is incorrect. The authors stated that the secondary middle turbinate is an accessory turbinate that is seen between the superior and middle turbinates. It should originate from the middle meatus posterosuperior to the ethmoid infundibulum.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.933en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnatomic variationsen_US
dc.subjectSecondary middle turbinateen_US
dc.subjectConchaen_US
dc.subjectParanasal sinusen_US
dc.subjectTomographyen_US
dc.titleCommentary on: "Evaluation of variations in sinonasal region with computed tomography"en_US
dc.typeletteren_US
dc.relation.journalWORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGYen_US
dc.identifier.volume8en_US
dc.identifier.issue12en_US
dc.identifier.startpage933en_US
dc.identifier.endpage934en_US
dc.identifier.wos000439503000005


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record