Red Blood Cell Distribution Width Increases During Infection in Renal and Liver Graft Recipients
Date
2017Author
Kayipmaz, Afsin Emre
Findik, Meliha
Kavalci, Cemil
Akdur, Aydincan
Moray, Gokhan
Haberal, Mehmet
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: Organ transplant is an effective treatment for patients with end- stage renal and hepatic failure. Increased use has introduced more emergency department admissions of infectious origin after transplant. Because infections usually manifest with simple complaints and fever, emer gency physicians need laboratory tests and radiologic imaging procedures to quickly detect the presence and source of infection. Our aim was to analyze fever-related emergency admissions of renal and hepatic graft recipients and determine whether admitted patients had increased red blood cell distribution width and mean platelet volume levels.
Materials and Methods: We reviewed the medical records of renal and hepatic graft patients who presented to our emergency department with fever during a 4-year period. Our analyses included 150 patients in which complete blood count and C-reactive protein results were available and the source of infection was determined. We compared results with a control group of 150 transplant patients without any infectious findings.
Results: In the 150 solid-organ graft recipients who presented to our emergency department with fever, significant differences were observed versus control patients with respect to white blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, red blood cell distribution width, mean platelet volume, and C-reactive protein levels (P <.05). We determined that C-reactive protein levels, red blood cell distribution width, mean platelet volume, and lymphocyte count were independent indicators of infection on multiple logistic regression analyses. We also determined that red blood cell distribution width had a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of 26%.
Conclusions: We found a significantly higher red blood cell distribution width in emergency admissions of infectious origin of renal and hepatic graft recipients than in the control group (P <.001), suggesting that this measurement is a suitable marker of infection for the emergency setting by virtue of rapid availability of test results and lack of extra costs.