Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSisli, S. N.
dc.contributor.authorGul Ates, E.
dc.contributor.authorOzcelik, T. B.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, B.
dc.contributor.authorRevilla Leon, M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-08T12:44:28Z
dc.date.available2024-05-08T12:44:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/12079
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the survival of root canal treated (RCT) teeth adjacent to an implant compared with that of RCT teeth of the same patient non-adjacent to an implant.Materials and methods: RCT tooth of each patient adjacent to an implant were included in the test group. The control group consisted of another RCT tooth of the same patient; the control RCT tooth was not adjacent to an implant and selected to be of the same type of the RCT tooth in the test group. 72 teeth of 36 patients with at least 4-year follow-up were included. In addition to survival, other clinical and demographic parameters investigated were age, sex, tooth type and position, presence of a crown, presence of retreatment, presence of a post-core, presence of adjacent edentulous area, presence of implant-supported fixed prosthetic restoration on the antagonist tooth and periapical health status. Pearson Chi-Square and Fisher Exact tests were used to compare the test and the control groups with categorical variables (alpha=0.05). Survival curves were obtained by the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Log-rank test was performed to compare the survival probabilities (alpha=0.05).Results: No significant difference in survival rates was observed between the test and the control groups (p = 0.72). Similarly, no significant relationship was found between the investigated clinical variables and the survival rates of RCT teeth (p>0.05). Survival times differed depending on the presence of an adjacent edentulous area (p<0.001) and the periapical health status (p = 0.026).Conclusions: RCT teeth with unhealed periapical tissues had a shorter cumulative survival time. Similarly, those adjacent to an edentulous area had shorter cumulative and complication-free survival times.Clinical Significance: This is the first study to determine the survival outcome of a RCT tooth adjacent to an implant compared to a non-adjacent one in the same patient. Being adjacent to an implant did not have a detrimental effect on the survival time and rate of RCT teeth.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104742en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRoot canal treated teethen_US
dc.subjectSurvivalen_US
dc.subjectDental implanten_US
dc.titleSurvival of Root Canal-Treated Teeth Adjacent to An Implant: A Retrospective Case-Control Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalJOURNAL OF DENTISTRYen_US
dc.identifier.volume139en_US
dc.identifier.wos001124562500001en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174739946en_US
dc.identifier.eissn1879-176Xen_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID37839623en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0001-5685-4409en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0002-6166-2601en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDJJF-5618-2023en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster