Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKaraca, Omer
dc.contributor.authorPinar, Huseyin Ulas
dc.contributor.authorGokmen, Zeynel
dc.contributor.authorDogan, Rafi
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T08:44:16Z
dc.date.available2020-10-08T08:44:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn0939-7248en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/4824
dc.description.abstractBackground Injection to the accurate area without any complications is the main factor for the efficiencies of caudal block. The aim of this study was to compare success and the complications of conventional and ultrasound method for caudal block in children. Materials and Methods Two-hundred sixty-six American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) category 1 children aged between 6 months and 6 years undergoing hypospadias, circumcision, or both surgeries were randomly allocated two groups (Group C or Group H, n =133). About 0.25% bupivacaine with 1/200000 adrenaline (total volume: 0.5 mL/kg) was injected after the needle was inserted into the sacral canal in Group C, or right after the needle pierced the sacrococcygeal ligament under longitudinal ultrasound view in Group H. Success rate of block, block performing time, number of needle puncture, success at first puncture, complication rate, age and weight of the patients encountering these complications were recorded. Results The success rate of block was similar between two groups (94.7% in Group C vs 96.2% in Group U, p >0.05). Success at first puncture was higher in Group U than in Group C (90.2 vs 66.2%, respectively; p <0.001). Number of needle puncture, blood aspiration, subcutaneous bulging, and bone contact was higher in Group C but none in Group U ( p <0.001) and these complications were occurred in children weighing<16kg and less younger than 6 years old. Conclusion We observed that the complications were not encountered, number of needle puncture was lesser, and the success rate of first puncture was higher under ultrasound with longitudinal view.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1055/s-0038-1676980en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectcaudal blocken_US
dc.subjectchildrenen_US
dc.subjectultrasounden_US
dc.subjectconventional methoden_US
dc.titleUltrasound-Guided versus Conventional Caudal Block in Children: A Prospective Randomized Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERYen_US
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage533en_US
dc.identifier.endpage538en_US
dc.identifier.wos000502379500008en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85075465388en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID30602192en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-0473-6763en_US
dc.contributor.orcID0000-0003-1933-2075en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDQ-2420-2015en_US
dc.contributor.researcherIDAAU-6923-2020en_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster