Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorErcan, Onder
dc.contributor.authorKostu, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorBakacak, Murat
dc.contributor.authorAytac-Thona, Yusuf
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Bora
dc.contributor.authorAvci, Fazil
dc.contributor.authorEfe, Erkan
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T13:13:18Z
dc.date.available2019-09-26T13:13:18Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn0379-5284
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4621723/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11727/4000
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the use of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). Methods: This prospective study was conducted on patients diagnosed with OAB who presenting to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Urology, School of Medicine, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Kahramanmaras, Turkey between October 2013 and August 2014. Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Group 1 (n=60) received 5 mg solifenacin per day, while Group 2 (n=59) received 4 mg fesoterodine per day. All the patients' OAB symptom scores (OABSS) in weeks 0, 4, and 12 were recorded. In addition, treatment costs and side effects of the drugs were evaluated. Results: Average OABSS (score 1) was determined as: 9.5 +/- 2.8 for Group 1 and 10.7 +/- 1.8 for Group 2 at week 0; 2.2 +/- 1.2 (Group 1) and 2.4 +/- 1.3 (Group 2) at week 4 (score 2); and 1.3 +/- 0.5 for Group 1 and 1.3 +/- 0.6 for Group 2 at week 12 (score 3). In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p=0.062 (score 1), p=0.464 (score 2), and p=0.527 (score 3). The discontinuation rate of medication due to its side effects was 0 (0%) for Group 1, and 6 (10.2%) for Group 2. Intragroup changes in the scores 1-2, 1-3, and 2-3 values was statistically significant in both groups (p<0.001). Conclusion: No significant difference was found between the OABSS of these 2 drugs. However, discontinuation of drugs due to side effects was more frequent in fesoterodine.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.15537/smj.2015.10.12016en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTOLTERODINE EXTENDED-RELEASEen_US
dc.subjectURINARY-TRACT SYMPTOMSen_US
dc.subjectEFFICACYen_US
dc.subjectINCONTINENCEen_US
dc.subjectMANAGEMENTen_US
dc.subjectWOMENen_US
dc.subjectMGen_US
dc.subjectSAFETYen_US
dc.subjectMENen_US
dc.titleComparison of solifenacin and fesoterodine in treatment of overactive bladderen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalSAUDI MEDICAL JOURNALen_US
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1181en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1185en_US
dc.identifier.wos000366141300007en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84944210907en_US
dc.contributor.pubmedID26446328en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergien_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster